Social Networking Sites (SNSs) are virtual communities where users can create individual public profiles, interact with real-life friends, and meet other people based on shared interests. They are seen as a ‘global consumer phenomenon’ with an exponential rise in usage within the last few years. Anecdotal case study evidence suggests that ‘addiction’ to social networks on the Internet may be a potential mental health problem for some users. However, the contemporary scientific literature addressing the addictive qualities of social networks on the Internet is scarce. Therefore, this literature review is intended to provide empirical and conceptual insight into the emerging phenomenon of addiction to SNSs by: (1) outlining SNS usage patterns, (2) examining motivations for SNS usage, (3) examining personalities of SNS users, (4) examining negative consequences of SNS usage, (5) exploring potential SNS addiction, and (6) exploring SNS addiction specificity and comorbidity. The findings indicate that SNSs are predominantly used for social purposes, mostly related to the maintenance of established offline networks. Moreover, extraverts appear to use social networking sites for social enhancement, whereas introverts use it for social compensation, each of which appears to be related to greater usage, as does low conscientiousness and high narcissism. Negative correlates of SNS usage include the decrease in real life social community participation and academic achievement, as well as relationship problems, each of which may be indicative of potential addiction.
References
[1]
Cohen, E. Five Clues that You Are Addicted to Facebook; CNN Health: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2009. Available online: http://articles.cnn.com/2009-04-23/health/ep.facebook.addict_1_facebook-page-facebook-world-social-networking?_s=PM:HEALTH , accessed on 18 August 2011.
[2]
Webley, K. It’s Time to Confront Your Facebook Addiction; Time Inc: New York, NY, USA, 2011. Available online: http://newsfeed.time.com/2010/07/08/its-time-to-confront-your-facebook-addiction/ , accessed on 18 August 2011.
[3]
Hafner, K. To Deal with Obsession, Some Defriend Facebook; The New York Times Company: New York, NY, USA, 2009. Available online: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/21/technology/internet/21facebook.html , accessed on 18 August 2011.
[4]
Revoir, P. Facebook to Blame for “Friendship Addiction”; Associated Newspapers Ltd: London, UK, 2008. Available online: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1079633/Facebook-blame-friendship-addiction-women.html , accessed on 18 August 2011.
[5]
The Nielsen Company. Global Audience Spends Two Hours More a Month on Social Networks than Last Year; The Nielsen Company: New York, NY, USA, 2010. Available online: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-audience-spends-two-hours-more-a-month-on-social-networks-than-last-year/ , accessed 18 August 2011.
[6]
Griffiths, M. Internet addiction—Time to be taken seriously? Addict Res 2000, 8, 413–418.
[7]
Young, K. Internet addiction: Evaluation and treatment. Student Brit Med J 1999, 7, 351–352.
[8]
Young, K. Facebook Addiction Disorder? The Center for Online Addiction: Bradford, PA, USA, 2009. Available online: http://www.netaddiction.com/index.php?option=com_blog&view=comments&pid=5&Itemid=0 , accessed on 29 November 2010.
[9]
Boyd, DM; Ellison, NB. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Comm 2008, 13, 210–230.
[10]
Jenkins, H. Convergence Culture. In Where Old and New Media Collide; New York University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
[11]
Milgram, S. The small world problem. Psychol Today 1967, 2, 60–67.
[12]
The Nielsen Company. Global Faces and Networked Places; The Nielsen Company: New York, NY, USA, 2009. Available online: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/nielsen_globalfaces_mar09.pdf , accessed on 18 August 2011.
[13]
Rheingold, H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier; MIT: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1993.
[14]
Li, L. Exploration of adolescents’ Internet addiction. Psychol Dev Educ, 2010, 26. Available online: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XLFZ201005019.htm , accessed on 16 Feburary 2011.
[15]
Sussman, S; Leventhal, A; Bluthenthal, RN; Freimuth, M; Forster, M; Ames, SL. A framework for specificity of the addictions. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011, 8, 3399–3415.
[16]
Griffiths, MD. A “components” model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. J Subst Use 2005, 10, 191–197.
[17]
Shaffer, HJ; LaPlante, DA; LaBrie, RA; Kidman, RC; Donato, AN; Stanton, MV. Toward a syndrome model of addiction: Multiple expressions, common etiology. Harvard Rev Psychiat 2004, 12, 367–374.
[18]
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—Text Revision, Fourth Edition ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
[19]
Lenhart, A. Social Networking Websites and Teens: An Overview; Pew Research Center: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. Available online: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_SNS_Data_Memo_Jan_2007.pdf.pdf , accessed on 27 November 2010.
[20]
Subrahmanyam, K; Reich, SM; Waechter, N; Espinoza, G. Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. J Appl Dev Psychol 2008, 29, 420–433.
[21]
Pempek, TA; Yermolayeva, YA; Calvert, SL. College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. J Appl Dev Psychol 2009, 30, 227–238.
[22]
Raacke, J; Bonds-Raacke, J. MySpace and facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychol Behav 2008, 11, 169–174.
[23]
Pfeil, U; Arjan, R; Zaphiris, P. Age differences in online social networking—A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace. Comput Hum Behav 2009, 25, 643–654.
[24]
Fogel, J; Nehmad, E. Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Comput Hum Behav 2009, 25, 153–160.
[25]
Jelicic, H; Bobek, DL; Phelps, E; Lerner, RM; Lerner, JV. Using positive youth development to predict contribution and risk behaviors in early adolescence: Findings from the first two waves of the 4-H Study of Positve Youth Development. Int J Behav Dev 2007, 31, 263–273.
[26]
Wilkinson, D; Thelwall, M. Social network site changes over time: The case of MySpace. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tech 2010, 61, 2311–2323.
[27]
Wise, K; Alhabash, S; Park, H. Emotional responses during social information seeking on Facebook. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 2010, 13, 555–562.
[28]
Lang, A; Potter, RF; Bolls, PD. Where psychophysiology meets the media: Taking the effects out of mass communication research. In Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research; Bryant, J, Oliver, MB, Eds.; Routledge Taylor and Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 185–206.
[29]
Park, HS; Kim, SH; Bang, SA; Yoon, EJ; Cho, SS; Kim, SE. Altered regional cerebral glucose metabolism in Internet game overusers: A F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography study. CNS Spectr 2010, 15, 159–166.
Comings, DE; Blum, K. Reward deficiency syndrome: Genetic aspects of behavioral disorders. In Cognition, Emotion and Autonomic Responses: The Integrative Role of the Prefrontal Cortex and Limbic Structures; Uylings, HBM, VanEden, CG, DeBruin, JPC, Feenstra, MGP, Pennartz, CMA, Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; Volume 126, pp. 325–341.
[32]
Griffiths, M. Internet gambling: Issues, concerns, and recommendations. CyberPsychol Behav 2003, 6, 557–568.
[33]
Ross, C; Orr, ES; Sisic, M; Arseneault, JM; Simmering, MG; Orr, RR. Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Comput Hum Behav 2009, 25, 578–586.
[34]
Davidson, W; Yu, F. Uses of mass communications by the individual. In Mass Communication Research: Major Issues and Future Directions; Praeger: New York, NY, USA, 1974; pp. 11–35.
[35]
Kwon, O; Wen, Y. An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Comput Hum Behav 2010, 26, 254–263.
[36]
Kim, JH; Kim, MS; Nam, Y. An analysis of self-construals, motivations, facebook use, and user satisfaction. Int J Hum-Comput Int 2010, 26, 1077–1099.
[37]
Barker, V. Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: The influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. CyberPsychol Behav 2009, 12, 209–213.
[38]
Cheung, CMK; Chiu, P-Y; Lee, MKO. Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Comput Hum Behav 2010, 27, 1337–1343.
[39]
Kujath, CL. Facebook and MySpace: Complement or substitute for face-to-face interaction? Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 2011, 14, 75–78.
[40]
Walther, JB. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun Res 1996, 23, 3–43.
[41]
Crystal, D. The scope of Internet linguistics. American Association for the Advancement of Science: Washington, DC, USA. Available online: http://www.davidcrystal.com/DC_articles/Internet2.pdf , accessed on 18 August 2011.
[42]
Thurlow, C. The Internet and language. In Concise Encyclopeia of Sociolinguistics; Mesthrie, R, Asher, R, Eds.; Pergamon: London, UK, 2001; pp. 287–289.
[43]
Ellison, NB; Steinfield, C; Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Comput-Mediat Comm, 2007, 12. Avaiable online: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html , accessed on 18 August 2011.
[44]
Bourdieu, P; Wacquant, L. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1992.
[45]
Putnam, RD. Bowling Alone; Simon & Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 2000.
[46]
Wellman, B; Gulia, M. The network basis of social support: A network is more than the sum of its ties. In Networks in the Global Village; Wellman, B, Ed.; Westview: Boulder, CO, USA, 1999.
[47]
Donath, J; Boyd, D. Public displays of connection. BT Technol J 2004, 22, 71–82.
[48]
Reich, SM. Adolescents’ sense of community on MySpace and facebook: A mixed-methods approach. J Community Psychol 2010, 38, 688–705.
[49]
Steinfield, C; Ellison, NB; Lampe, C. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. J Appl Dev Psychol 2008, 29, 434–445.
[50]
Armstrong, L; Phillips, JG; Saling, LL. Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. Int J Hum-Comput St 2000, 53, 537–550.
[51]
Ghassemzadeh, L; Shahraray, M; Moradi, A. Prevalence of Internet addiction and comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Iranian high schools. CyberPsychol Behav 2008, 11, 731–733.
[52]
Ji, YG; Hwangbo, H; Yi, JS; Rau, PLP; Fang, XW; Ling, C. The influence of cultural differences on the use of social network services and the formation of social capital. Int J Hum-Comput Int 2010, 26, 1100–1121.
[53]
Sledgianowski, D; Kulviwat, S. Using social network sites: The effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context. J Comput Inform Syst 2009, 49, 74–83.
[54]
Livingstone, S. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media Soc 2008, 10, 393–411.
[55]
Kim, Y; Sohn, D; Choi, SM. Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students. Comput Hum Behav 2011, 27, 365–372.
[56]
Zywica, J; Danowski, J. The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses: Predicting Facebook and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. J Comput-Mediat Comm 2008, 14, 1–34.
[57]
Lee, G; Lee, J; Kwon, S. Use of social-networking sites and subjective well-being: A study in South Korea. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 2011, 14, 151–155.
[58]
Pollet, TV; Roberts, SGB; Dunbar, RIM. Use of social network sites and instant messaging does not lead to increased offline social network size, or to emotionally closer relationships with offline network members. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 2011, 14, 253–258.
[59]
Mehdizadeh, S. Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on facebook. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 2010, 13, 357–364.
[60]
Buffardi, EL; Campbell, WK. Narcissism and social networking web sites. Pers Soc Psychol B 2008, 34, 1303–1314.
[61]
Zhao, SY; Grasmuck, S; Martin, J. Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Comput Hum Behav 2008, 24, 1816–1836.
[62]
Manago, AM; Graham, MB; Greenfield, PM; Salimkhan, G. Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. J Appl Dev Psychol 2008, 29, 446–458.
Cain, NM; Pincus, AL; Ansell, EB. Narcissism at the crossroads: Phenotypic description of pathological narcissism across clinical theory, social/personality psychology, and psychiatric diagnosis. Clin Psychol Rev 2008, 28, 638–656.
[65]
La Barbera, D; La Paglia, F; Valsavoia, R. Social network and addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009, 12, 628–629.
[66]
Correa, T; Hinsley, AW; de Zuniga, HG. Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Comput Hum Behav 2010, 26, 247–253.
[67]
Amichai-Hamburger, Y; Vinitzky, G. Social network use and personality. Comput Hum Behav 2010, 26, 1289–1295.
[68]
Costa, PT; McCrae, RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional Manual; Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL, USA, 1992.
[69]
Orr, ES; Ross, C; Simmering, MG; Arseneault, JM; Orr, RR. The influence of shyness on the use of Facebook in an undergraduate sample. CyberPsychol Behav 2009, 12, 337–340.
[70]
Valkenburg, PM; Peter, J; Schouten, AP. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychol Behav 2006, 9, 584–590.
[71]
Nyland, R; Marvez, R; Beck, J. MySpace: Social networking or social isolation? Proceedings of the Midwinter Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Midwinter Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Reno, NV, USA, 23–24 February 2007.
[72]
Suler, J. The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychol Behav 2004, 7, 321–326.
Phillips, M. MySpace or Yours? Social Networking Sites Surveillance in Romantic Relationships; Western States Communication Association: Mesa, AZ, USA, 2009.
[75]
Tokunaga, RS. Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Comput Hum Behav 2011, 27, 705–713.
[76]
Muise, A; Christofides, E; Desmarais, S. More information than you ever wanted: Does facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychol Behav 2009, 12, 441–444.
[77]
Persch, JA. Jealous Much? MySpace, Facebook Can Spark It; The Msnbc Digital Network: New York, NY, USA, 2007. Available online: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20431006/ , accessed on 18 August 2011.
[78]
Luscombe, B. Social norms: Facebook and divorce. Time 2009, 173, 93–94.
Kuntsche, E; Stewart, SH; Cooper, ML. How stable is the motive-alcohol use link? A cross-national validation of the drinking motives questionnaire revised among adolescents from Switzerland, Canada, and the United States. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2008, 69, 388–396.
[81]
Echeburua, E; de Corral, P. Addiction to new technologies and to online social networking in young people: A new challenge. Adicciones 2010, 22, 91–95.
[82]
Wilson, K; Fornasier, S; White, KM. Psychological predictors of young adults’ use of social networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 2010, 13, 173–177.
[83]
Pelling, EL; White, KM. The theory of planned behavior applied to young people’s use of social networkting web sites. CyberPsychol Behav 2009, 12, 755–759.
[84]
Karaiskos, D; Tzavellas, E; Balta, G; Paparrigopoulos, T. Social network addiction: A new clinical disorder? Eur Psychiat 2010, 25, 855.
[85]
Zhou, SX. Gratifications, loneliness, leisure boredom and self-esteem as predictors of SNS-game addiction and usage pattern among Chinese college students. MS Thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 2010.
[86]
Wan, C. Gratifications & loneliness as predictors of campus-SNS websites addiction & usage pattern among Chinese college students. MS Thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 2009.
[87]
Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec 1991, 50, 179–211.
[88]
Terry, DHM; White, K. The theory of planned behavior: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. Brit J Soc Psychol 1999, 38, 225–244.
[89]
Baumeister, R; Leary, M. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol Bull 2005, 117, 497–529.
[90]
Ehrenberg, A; Juckes, S; White, KM; Walsh, SP. Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people’s technology use. CyberPsychol Behav 2008, 11, 739–741.
[91]
Costa, PT; McCrae, RR. NEO PI-R Professional Manual; Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, TX, USA, 1992.
[92]
Coopersmith, S. Self-esteem Inventories; Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1981.
[93]
Walsh, SP; White, KM; Young, RM. Young and connected: Psychological influences of mobile phone use amongst Australian youth. In Mobile Media 2007; Goggin, G, Hjorth, L, Eds.; University of Sydney: Sydney, Australia, 2007; pp. 125–134.
[94]
Landers, RN; Lounsbury, JW. An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. Comput Hum Behav 2004, 22, 283–293.
[95]
Kuss, DJ; Griffiths, MD. Internet gaming addiction: A systematic review of empirical research. Int J Ment Health Addict 2011. in press.
[96]
Kuss, DJ; Griffiths, MD. Internet gambling behavior. In Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2011. in press.
[97]
Kuss, DJ; Griffiths, MD. Internet sex addiction: A review of empirical research. Addict Res Theory 2011. in press.
[98]
Young, K. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychol Behav 1996, 3, 237–244.
Iso-Ahola, SE; Weissinger, E. Receptions of boredom in leisure: Conceptualization, reliability and validity of the leisure boredom scale. J Leisure Res 1990, 22, 1–17.
[101]
Rosenberg, M; Schooler, C; Schoenbach, C. Self-esteem and adolescent problems: Modeling reciprocal effects. Am Sociol Rev 1989, 54, 1004–1018.
[102]
World Health Organization (WHO). ICD 10: The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1992.
[103]
Hall, W; Degenhardt, L; Teesson, M. Understanding comorbidity between substance use, anxiety and affective disorders: Broadening the research base. Addict Behav 2009, 34, 795–799.
[104]
Malat, J; Collins, J; Dhayanandhan, B; Carullo, F; Turner, NE. Addictive behaviors in comorbid addiction and mental illness: Preliminary results from a self-report questionnaire. J Addict Med 2010, 4, 38–46.
[105]
Black, DW; Belsare, G; Schlosser, S. Clinical features, psychiatric comorbidity, and health-related quality of life in persons reporting compulsive computer use behavior. J Clin Psychiat 1999, 60, 839–844.
[106]
Müller, KW; Dickenhorst, U; Medenwaldt, J; W？lfling, K; Koch, A. Internet addiction as comorbid disorder in patients with a substance-related disorder: Results from a survey in different inpatient clinics. Eur Psychiat 2011, 26, 1912.
[107]
Yen, JY; Yen, CF; Chen, CC; Chen, SH; Ko, CH. Family factors of Internet addiction and substance use experience in Taiwanese adolescents. CyberPsychol Behav 2007, 10, 323–329.
[108]
Lam, LT; Peng, ZW; Mai, JC; Jing, J. Factors associated with Internet addiction among adolescents. CyberPsychol Behav 2009, 12, 551–555.
[109]
Young, K. Caught in the Net; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1998.
[110]
Kuntsche, E; Knibbe, R; Gmel, G; Engels, R. Replication and validation of the drinking motive questionnaire revised (DMQ-R, Cooper, 1994) among adolescents in Switzerland. Eur Addict Res 2006, 12, 161–168.
[111]
Ko, CH; Yen, JY; Chen, CC; Chen, SH; Wu, K; Yen, CF. Tridimensional personality of adolescents with Internet addiction and substance use experience. Can J Psychiat 2006, 51, 887–894.
[112]
Downs, C. The Facebook phenomenon: Social networking and gambling. Proceeding of the Gambling and Social Responsibility Forum Conference, Manchester, UK, 2–3 September 2008; Manchester Metropolitan University: Manchester, UK, 2008.
[113]
Griffiths, MD; King, DL; Delfabbro, PH. Adolescent gambling-like experiences: Are they a cause for concern? Educ Health 2009, 27, 27–30.
[114]
Ipsos MORI. British Survey of Children, the National Lottery and Gambling 2008–2009. In Report of A Quantitative Survey; National Lottery Commission: Salford, UK, 2009.
[115]
Griffiths, MD; Parke, J. Adolescent gambling on the Internet: A review. Int J Adol Med Health 2010, 22, 58–75.
[116]
King, D; Delfabbro, P; Griffiths, M. The convergence of gambling and digital media: Implications for gambling in young people. J Gambl Stud 2010, 26, 175–187.
[117]
Griffiths, MD. Gaming in social networking sites: A growing concern? World Online Gambl Law Rep 2010, 9, 12–13.
[118]
Fogel, J; Nehmad, E. Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Comput Hum Behav 2009, 25, 153–160.
[119]
Lévy, P. Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace; Perseus: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997.
[120]
Batthyány, D; Müller, KW; Benker, F; W？lfling, K. Computer game playing: Clinical characteristics of dependence and abuse among adolescents. Wiener Klinsche Wochenschrift 2009, 121, 502–509.
[121]
W？lfling, K; Grüsser, SM; Thalemann, R. Video and computer game addiction. Int J Psychol 2008, 43, 769–769.
[122]
Bhandari, A; Wagner, TH. Self-report Utilization: Improving Measurement and Accuracy; US National Institutes of Health: San Diego, CA, USA, 2004.
[123]
Beard, KW. Internet addiction: A review of current assessment techniques and potential assessment questions. CyberPsychol Behav 2005, 8, 7–14.
