Heidegger y la Hermenéutica del Cuerpo

From the field of French phenomenology, the deconstructivist, feminist studies and environmentalism has repeatedly criticized the absence of an explicit thematization of the phenomenon of the body in Heidegger's work. Beyond recognizing some of the merits of these criticisms, this paper attempts to answer the question of why Heidegger ignored the analysis of the body first and see where such an analysis in the context of his philosophical project. First, it clarifies the reasons for the absence of the subject's body in Being and Time. Second, it provides an analysis of Zollikon seminars, where Heidegger addresses for the first time in his work the phenomenon of the body in a way that, to the surprise of many critics, significantly overlaps with the phenomenology of Maurice Merleau-Ponty. And third, it addresses the issue of neutrality and asexuality of Dasein and exposed the philosophical reasons that explain the fact that Heidegger speaks of Dasein sexual neutrality in the context of existential analytic.