|
Measuring Congressional Partisanship on Energy and the Environment in the Age of Obama: The Cases of Offshore Drilling in Alaska and the Keystone XL PipelineDOI: 10.4236/oalib.1103181, PP. 1-9 Subject Areas: Politics Keywords: Energy, Environment, Politics, Oil, Obama Abstract
The hypothesis for this article is that partisan
voting in the US Congress since the 1980s
prompts the need to confirm it empirically as a baseline for exploring other
variables that may influence public policy decisions. It is worthwhile to measure
that partisanship in two key
energy-environmental policies during the Obama Presidency. First, how did
partisan voting affect the decision by Shell to cease offshore exploratory drilling in the Arctic in 2015? Moreover,
was partisanship a factor in President Obama’s
rejection of the Keystone XL pipeline that year? I found the degrees of congressional
partisanship to be very high on key votes in both cases, but relatively lower
in the Keystone case. The inference is that legislative party politics can offer
a partial explanation for policy continuity or change. These findings set the
stage for further inquiry on other
explanatory variables both within and external to the political system.
McMonagle, R. (2016). Measuring Congressional Partisanship on Energy and the Environment in the Age of Obama: The Cases of Offshore Drilling in Alaska and the Keystone XL Pipeline. Open Access Library Journal, 3, e3181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103181. References
comments powered by Disqus |