全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

A “Citation Surplus” Should Be Added to the h-Index

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1103959, PP. 1-5

Subject Areas: Statistics

Keywords: h-Index, Scientific Productivity, Scientometrics, Pareto-Efficiency

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The h-index is the largest number h such that h publications have at least h citations. The index reflects both the number of publications and the number of citations per publication. One unperceived deficiency of this metric is that it is Pareto-inefficient. A “citation surplus” would be absent and, thus, the h-index would be efficient for a researcher if all his h papers that are equal or above his h-index received exactly h citations. This inefficiency would not be of great concern if those h papers were normally distributed. However, the rank from top to bottom does not decay exponentially. The decay follows the power law known in the literature as Lotka’s law. To remedy this deficiency, I suggest the h-index be supplemented by a researcher’s citation surplus.

Cite this paper

Silva, S. D. (2017). A “Citation Surplus” Should Be Added to the h-Index. Open Access Library Journal, 4, e3959. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103959.

References

[1]  
Hirsch, J.E. (2005) An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output. PNAS, 102, 16569-16572. 
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
[2]  Lotka, A.J. (1926) The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317-323.
[3]  

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413