全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

A Review of the Neural Mechanisms of Deception

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1106857, PP. 1-9

Subject Areas: Psychology

Keywords: Instructed Deception, Spontaneous Deception, Cognitive Neural Mechanism

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Deception is an important part of human social interaction and is based on trying to manipulate the opinions or beliefs of others. Because of its social relevance, deception has always been the focus of scientific research. With the rapid development of modern neuroimaging methods, researchers have become more and more interested in the neural mechanism of deception. According to different research methods, this paper divides deception into instructed deception and spontaneous deception. From the different types of research paradigms of deception, the cognitive processes involved in deception and the existing research results on the neural mechanism of deception, the future research direction of deception neural mechanism is to be found.

Cite this paper

Zhou, J. , Gu, T. and Jin, F. (2020). A Review of the Neural Mechanisms of Deception. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e6857. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106857.

References

[1]  DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K. and Cooper, H. (2003) Cues to Deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
[2]  Darwin, C. (1877) A Biographical Sketch of an Infant. Mind, 2, 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-2.7.285
[3]  Vrij, A., Evans, H., Akehurst, L. and Mann, S. (2004) Rapid Judgements in Assessing Verbal and Nonverbal Cues: Their Potential for Deception Researchers and lie Detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.964
[4]  Ben-Shakhar, G. and Elaad, E. (2002) Effects of Questions’ Repetition and Variation on the Efficiency of the Guilty Knowledge Test: A Reexamination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 972-977. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.972
[5]  Ben-Shakhar, G. and Elaad, E. (2003) The Validity of Psychophysiological Detection of Information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131-151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.131
[6]  Luo, Y.J., Sun, S.Y., Mai, X.Q., Gu, R.L. and Zhang, H.J. (2010) Outcome Evaluation in Decision Making: ERP Studies. In: Han, S. and Pöppel, E., Eds., Culture and Neural Frames of Cognition and Communication, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 249-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15423-2_16
[7]  Ganis, G., Kosslyn, S.M., et al. (2003) Neural Correlates of Different Types of Deception: An fMRI Investigation. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 830-836. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.8.830
[8]  Carrión, R.E., Keenan, J.P. and Sebanz, N. (2010) A Truth That’s Told with Bad Intent: An ERP Study of Deception. Cognition, 114, 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.014
[9]  Spence, S.A., Farrow, T.F.D., Herford, A.E., Wilkinson, I.D., Zheng, Y. and Woodruff, P.W.R. (2001) Behavioural and Functional Anatomical Correlates of Deception in Humans: Neuroreport, 12, 2849-2853. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200109170-00019
[10]  Ding, X.P., Gao, X.Q., Fu, G.Y. and Lee, K. (2013) Neural Correlates of Spontaneous Deception: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study. Neuropsychologia, 51, 704-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.018
[11]  Pornpattananangkul, N., Zhen, S.S. and Yu, R.J. (2018) Common and Distinct Neural Correlates of Self-Serving and Prosocial Dishonesty. Human Brain Mapping, 39, 3086-3103. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24062
[12]  Christ, S.E., Van Essen, D.C., Watson, J.M., Brubaker, L.E. and McDermott, K.B. (2009) The Contributions of Prefrontal Cortex and Executive Control to Deception: Evidence from Activation Likelihood Estimate Meta-Analyses. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1557-1566. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn189
[13]  Sip, K.E., Roepstorff, A., McGregor, W. and Frith, C.D. (2008) Detecting Deception: The Scope and Limits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.008
[14]  Lee, T.M.C., Liu, H.L., Tan, L.H., Chan, C.C.H., Mahankali, S., Feng, C.M., Hou, J.W., Fox, P.T. and Gao, J.H. (2002) Lie Detection by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10020
[15]  Langleben, D.D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J.A., Gur, R.C., McDonald, S., Ragland, J.D., O’Brien, C.P. and Childress, A.R. (2002) Brain Activity during Simulated Deception: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study. NeuroImage, 15, 727-732. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1003
[16]  Yin, L.J., Reuter, M. and Weber, B. (2016) Let the Man Choose What to Do: Neural Correlates of Spontaneous Lying and Truth-Telling. Brain and Cognition, 102, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.11.007
[17]  Greene, J.D. and Paxton, J.M. (2009) Patterns of Neural Activity Associated with Honest and Dishonest Moral Decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 12506-12511. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900152106
[18]  Gneezy, U. (2005) Deception: The Role of Consequences. American Economic Review, 95, 384-394. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828662
[19]  Abe, N., Greene, J.D. and Kiehl, K.A. (2018) Reduced Engagement of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex in the Dishonest Decision-Making of Incarcerated Psychopaths. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13, 797-807. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy050
[20]  Gerlach, P., Teodorescu, K. and Hertwig, R. (2019) The Truth About Lies: A Meta-Analysis on Dishonest Behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 145, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000174
[21]  Abeler, J., Becker, A. and Falk, A. (2014) Representative Evidence on Lying Costs. Journal of Public Economics, 113, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.01.005
[22]  Yin, L.J. and Weber, B. (2019) I Lie, Why Don’t You: Neural Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Self-Serving Lying. Human Brain Mapping, 40, 1101-1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24432
[23]  Sun, D., Chan, C.C.H., Hu, Y., Wang, Z.X. and Lee, T.M.C. (2015) Neural Correlates of Outcome Processing Postdishonest Choice: An fMRI and ERP Study. Neuropsychologia, 68, 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.013
[24]  Liljeholm, M., Dunne, S. and O’Doherty, J.P. (2014) Anterior Insula Activity Reflects the Effects of Intentionality on the Anticipation of Aversive Stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 11339-11348. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1126-14.2014
[25]  Yin, L.J., Hu, Y., Dynowski, D., Li, J. and Weber, B. (2017) The Good Lies: Altruistic Goals Modulate Processing of Deception in the Anterior Insula. Human Brain Mapping, 38, 3675-3690. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23623
[26]  Volz, K.G., Vogeley, K., Tittgemeyer, M., von Cramon, D.Y. and Sutter, M. (2015) The Neural Basis of Deception in Strategic Interactions. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00027
[27]  Zhang, M.M., Liu, T., Pelowski, M. and Yu, D.C. (2017) Gender Difference in Spontaneous Deception: A Hyperscanning Study Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 7508. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06764-1

Full-Text


comments powered by Disqus

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133

WeChat 1538708413