Biogas technology is one of the renewable technologies that use biodegradable waste such as human waste (HW), agricultural waste, animal and food waste. Over 90% of the population in Malawi is heavily reliant on firewood as their primary source of energy for cooking. This results in deforestation, pollution of the environment, and great monetary expenditure to buy firewood, more especially by boarding schools. A co-digestion biogas plant that uses human, animal, agriculture, and canteen food waste has been designed. This study design was based on the use of HW and canteen food wastes (CFW) as the substrate for the biodigester to produce methane (CH4) gas that could be used for cooking and lighting at Phalombe Secondary School in Malawi to replace firewood. With a school population of 757 people, design calculations/stimations were performed to find out the amount of HW and CFW required per day. A field survey at the school was carried out to appreciate the problem the school is facing so that a solution could be found. Based on factors such as energy demand at the school, availability of feedstock, size of the digester, biogas yield, life span of the biodigester, and availability of construction materials, the type of biogas plant suitable for this purpose has been selected and designed. A computer-aided design (Auto CAD) software was used for the drawing. These design parameters were arrived at through a baseline survey, observation methods, and literature reviews. Through a questionnaire, a detailed energy demand analysis was carried out from whose results a fixed dome biogas plant of digester size 62 m3, gasometer of size 19 m3, and digestate collection tank size of 61 m3 has been designed. The design came up with an amount of HW and CFW of 286 and 60 kg per day respectively making total organic raw materials of 346 kg per day. The macromolecular composition of the HW, CFW, and mixture of HW and CFW in terms of dry matter (DM) was 11%, 45% and 56% of carbohydrate, 3%, 15%, and 18% of protein, 15%, 40%, and 30% lipids, and 15%, 0%, and 15% of ash respectively. The substrate showed a high degradability of 90%. The simulation analysis showed that HW produced 185 m3 per kg of biogas which represented 64% and 35.9% CH4 and carbon dioxide (CO2), CFW produced 58.9 m3 per kg that represented 61.1% and 38.4% of CH4 ad CO2, and mixture produced 265 m3 per kg contained 59% and 41% of CH4 and CO2 in 40 days respectively. A cost estimate of the design has been carried out to appreciate the economic viability of the biogas technology and is estimated at the US$5277. The cost of constructing a biogas plant at the school is less than what the school is spending currently on firewood and electricity, a recommendation has been made to adopt the technology to reduce the financial burden the school is facing.
Cite this paper
Kawelamzenje, N. A. , Twizerimana, M. , Bernadette, D. and Bakundukize, A. (2021). Design of a Co-Digestion Biogas Plant to Curb Deforestation-Case Study of Phalombe Secondary School in Malawi. Open Access Library Journal, 8, e7255. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107255.
Adhikari, R.S.S.K., Sims, R.E.H., Hasslet, S. and Murray, P. (2015) Improvement of Biogas Production Efficiency through Co-Digestion Cattle Dung with Crop Residues. Case Study: Nepal. Ninth International Conference on Sensing Technology, Auckland, 8-10 December 2015, 803-810.
Twizerimana, M., Marimi, M., Bura, X. and Nganyi, E.O. (2020) Biogas Production from Co-Digestion of Cotton Yarn Waste and Human Urine. Journal of Energy Research and Reviews, 6, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.9734/jenrr/2020/v6i130158
Ramatsa, I.M., Akinlabi, E.T., Madyira, D.M. and Huberts, R. (2014) Design of the Bio-Digester for Biogas Production: A Review. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, Vol. 2, San Francisco, 22-24 October 2014, 628-631.
Regattieri, A., Bortolini, M., Ferrari, E., Gamberi, M. and Piana, F. (2018) Biogas Micro-Production from Human Organic Waste—A Research Proposal. Sustainability, 10, 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020330
Ali, M.F. and Islam, R. (2014) Designing Human and Kitchen Waste Based Biogas & Solar Plant for Pabna University of Science & Technology (PUST) Campus and Cost-Benefit Analysis after Renewable Energy Interconnection on PUST Campus’s Grid Network. 28-34.
Chen, X.G.A., Adl, M., Sheng, K.C. and Xia, Y.H. (2012) Examining a Hybrid Plug-Flow Pilot Reactor for Anaerobic Digestion of Farm-Based Biodegradable Solids. International Journal of Environment, 6, 335-344.
Omer, A.M. (2016) An Overview of Biomass and Biogas for Energy Generation: Recent Development and Perspectives. Advanced Materials: TechConnect Briefs, 2, 122-125. https://doi.org/10.31248/JBBD2016.010
Hafner, S.D., Koch, K., Carrere, H., Astals, S., Weinrich, S. and Rennuit, C. (2018) Software for Biogas Research: Tools for Measurement and Prediction of Methane Production. SoftwareX, 7, 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2018.06.005
Zheng, Y., Zhao, J., Xu, F. and Li, Y. (2014) Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Enhanced Biogas Production. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 42, 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2014.01.001
Tumutegyereize, P., Ketlogetswe, C., Gandure, J. and Banadda, N. (2016) Effect of Variation in Co-Digestion Ratios of Matooke, Cassava, and Sweet Potato Peels on Hydraulic Retention Time, Methane Yield and Its Kinetics. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, 6, 93-115. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2016.64009
Madyira, E.T.A.D.M., Huberts, R. and Ramatsa, I.M. (2014) Design of the Bio-Digester for Biogas Production: A Review. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, San Francisco, 22-24 October 2014, 1-5.
Gashaw, A. (2014) Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Biodegradable Municipal Solid Waste with Human Excreta for Biogas Production: A Review. American Journal of Applied Chemistry, 2, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajac.20140204.12
Guarino, G., Carotenuto, C., Di Cristofaro, F., Papa, S., Morrone, B. and Minale, M. (2016) Does the C/N Ratio Affect the Bio-Methane Yield? A Three Years Investigation of Buffalo Manure Digestion. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 49, 463-468.
Naik, L., Gebreegziabher, Z., Tumwesige, V., Balana, B., Mwirigi, J. and Austin, G. (2014) Factors Determining the Stability and Productivity of Small-Scale Anaerobic Digesters. Biomass and Bioenergy, 70, 51-57.
Malikanthi, T.J.J., Ruchira, A. and Senayake, N.S. (2015) Anaerobic Digestion of Food and Market Waste; Waste Characterization and Biomethane Potential: A Case Study in Sri Lanka. SLEMA Journal, 18, 29-33.
Sadjere, B.G.E., Ejiroghene, K.O. and Patrick, O.E. (2017) Effect of Organic Loading Rate (OLR) on Biogas Yield Using a Single and Three-Stages Continuous Anaerobic Digestion Reactors. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 39, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.39.147
Agus Haryanto, A., Triyono, S. and Nugroho, H.W. (2018) Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on Biogas Production from Cow Dung in a Semi Continuous Anaerobic Digester. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 7, 93-100.