Governance of the State-Based Social Protection System of Persons with Disability: A Case from Tarakeshwor and Dakshinkali Municipality, Kathmandu, Nepal
The state-based social protection system encompasses policies, programs, and institutional mechanisms. However, the social protection study in Nepal primarily encompasses social security allowance and has missed the anthropological lens. This article examines the operational mechanisms of the disability social protection system, their perpetuation of government policies, institutional frameworks, and stakeholder collaborations based on intersectionality through Foucault’s concepts of governmentality and biopolitics in the realm of social protection for Persons with Disabilities (PwDs). Grounded in the interpretive philosophical perspective, this exploratory study discusses the governance of the state-based social protection model using ethnographic data—coupled with qualitative and quantitative data collected within the timeframe of April-October 2023 in Tarakeshwor and Dakshinkali, Kathmandu Nepal. Largely, governance is analyzed from the perspective of policy provision, accessibility, accountability mechanism and institutional framework. The study assesses the significance of the relationship between various categories and the perceived role of the state in terms of social protection. This concludes that no significant association between the state and the ethnicity affiliation while the perceived role of the state is a significant association between the types of family, disability by birth or later, education of PwD, type of residence, income source, and equity quintile. The data reveals significant disparities in the prevalence of disabilities across various ethnic, educational, and socio-economic groups, indicating the need for tailored policies and interventions. This analysis of intersectionality underscores the importance of addressing intersectional factors to effectively support individuals with disabilities.
Cite this paper
Bhujel, I. B. (2024). Governance of the State-Based Social Protection System of Persons with Disability: A Case from Tarakeshwor and Dakshinkali Municipality, Kathmandu, Nepal. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e1828. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111828.
WHO (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.
https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/42407/9241545429
.pdf;jsessionid=5650A1C035FC8293AB79F798D7FABB36?sequence=1
CBS (2022) National Population and Housing Census.
https://censusnepal.cbs.gov.np/Home/Details?tpid=5&a
mp;dcid=3479c092-7749-4ba6-9369-45486cd67f30&tfsid=17
Eide, A.H., Neupane, S. and Hem, K.-G. (2016) Living Conditions among People with Disability in Nepal.
https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/sintef-teknologi-o
g-samfunn/rapporter-sintef-ts/sintef-a27656-nepalwebversion.pdf
Petasis, A. (2019) Discrepancies of the Medical, Social, and Biopsychosocial Models of Disability: A Comprehensive Theoretical Framework. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 3, 42–54.
Ahmad, M.M. (2013) Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies, and Politics. Development in Practice, 23, 151-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2013.753033
UN (1961) Universal Declaration of Hu-man Rights.
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration
-of-human-rights#:~:text=Proclaims%20this%20Universal%2
0Declaration%20of,these%20rights%20and%20freedoms%20and
U.N. ESCAP (2012) Incheon Strategy to Make the Right Real for Persons with Disabilities in Asia and the Pacific.
https://www.unescap.org/resources/incheon-strategy-%E2%80%9
Cmake-right-real%E2%80%9D-persons-disabilities-asia-and-pacific
Vinet, L. and Zhedanov, A. (2011) A ‘Missing’ Family of Classical Orthogonal Polynomials. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44, Article 085201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201
Hickey, S. (2011) The Politics of Social Protection: What Do We Get from a ‘Social Contract’ Ap-proach? Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 32, 426-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2011.647447
Johnson, A. (2005) European Welfare States and Supranational Governance of Social Policy. In: European Welfare States and Supranational Governance of Social Policy, Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230006195_1
Kooiman, J. and Bavinck, M. (2013) Theorizing Governabil-ity—The Interactive Governance Perspective. In: MARE Publication Series, Springer Netherlands, 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6107-0_2
Weiss, T.G. (2012) Governance, Good Governance, and Global Gov-ernance: Conceptual and Actual Challenges. Thinking about Global Governance: Why People and Ideas Matter, 21, 168–189.
Ansell, C. and Torfing, J. (2016) Introduction: Theories of Governance. In: Handbook on Theories of Governance, Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548508.00008
Graham, M.F., Gordon, B.C. and Miller, P. (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality with Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault. University of Chicago Press.