%0 Journal Article
%T Un Modelo L¨®gico-Formal para el Estudio de los Argumentos Emocionales en los Procesos de Construcci¨®n de Acuerdos
%A AGUILERA ONTIVEROS
%A ANTONIO
%A CONTRERAS MANRIQUE
%A JULIO C
%J Revista Colombiana de Psicolog¨ªa
%D 2011
%I Universidad Nacional de Colombia
%X arguments are part of a communicative process through which people try to influence the actions of others. gilbert (1994) identifies four modes of argumentation: (a) logical, (b) emotional, (c) visceral, and (d) kisceral. following the line of research in computational psychology proposed by ortony, clore and collins (1988), and the model of conflict resolution using argumentation-based negotiations proposed by jung and tambe (2001), this paper presents a logical-formal model for studying of emotional arguments within the context of consensus building framed in negotiation and coordination processes.
%K argumentation theory
%K emotional arguments
%K emotional consensus
%K formal methods in multi-agent systems
%K computational psychology.
%U http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-54692011000200006&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en