%0 Journal Article
%T Beneficios econ¨®micos del implante coclear para la hipoacusia sensorineural profunda
%A Pe£¿aranda
%A Augusto
%A Mendieta
%A Juan Carlos
%A Perdomo
%A Jorge Andr¨¦s
%A Aparicio
%A Mar¨ªa Leonor
%A Mar¨ªn
%A Lina Marcela
%A Garc¨ªa
%A Juan Manuel
%A Bar¨®n
%A Clemencia
%J Revista Panamericana de Salud P¨²blica
%D 2012
%I Organizaci¨®n Panamericana de la Salud
%R 10.1590/S1020-49892012000400009
%X objective: evaluate the cost-benefit, cost-utility, and cost-effectiveness of cochlear implantation, comparing it to the use of hearing aids in children with profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. methods: the nonparametric propensity score matching method was used to carry out an economic and impact assessment of the cochlear implant and then perform cost-benefit, cost-utility, and cost-effectiveness analyses. primary information was used, taken randomly from 100 patients: 62 who received cochlear implants (treatment group) and 38 belonging to the control group who used hearing aids to treat profound sensorineural hearing loss. results: an economic cost differential was found-to the advantage of the cochlear implant-of close to us$ 204 000 between the implant and the use of hearing aids over the expected life span of the patients analyzed. this amount refers to the greater expenses that hearing-aid patients will have. with this adjusted figure, the cost-benefit indicator shows that for each dollar invested to treat the cochlear-implant patient, there is a return on the investment of us$ 2.07. conclusions: the cochlear implant produces economic benefits for the patient. it also produces health utilities since positive cost-utility (gain in decibels) and cost-effectiveness (gain in language discrimination) ratios were found.
%K cost-benefit analysis
%K hearing loss
%K cochlear implants
%K hearing aids
%K colombia.
%U http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1020-49892012000400009&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en