%0 Journal Article
%T Inhibition of Notch signaling affects hepatic oval cell response in rat model of 2AAF-PH
%A Darwiche H
%A Oh S-H
%A Steiger-Luther NC
%A Williams JM
%A Pintilie DG
%A Shupe TD
%A Petersen BE
%J Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research
%D 2011
%I 
%R http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S12368
%X hibition of Notch signaling affects hepatic oval cell response in rat model of 2AAF-PH Original Research (1738) Total Article Views Authors: Darwiche H, Oh S-H, Steiger-Luther NC, Williams JM, Pintilie DG, Shupe TD, Petersen BE Published Date September 2011 Volume 2011:3 Pages 89 - 98 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S12368 Houda Darwiche, Seh-Hoon Oh, Nicole C Steiger-Luther, Jennifer M Williams, Dana G Pintilie, Thomas D Shupe, Bryon E Petersen Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, Program in Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Background and aims: Activation of the oval cell compartment occurs in the liver when hepatocytes are functionally compromised and/or unable to divide. Our goal was to investigate the systemic signals responsible for determining the efficiency of oval cell-mediated liver regeneration, focusing on the Notch signaling cascade. Methods: The established oval cell induction protocol of 2-acetylaminofluorine (2-AAF) implantation followed by 70% surgical resection of the liver (partial hepatectomy, PH) was employed in a rat model. This oval cell induction model was further combined with injections of a ¦Ã-secretase inhibitor (GSI XX) to examine the effects of Notch inhibition on oval cell-aided regeneration of the liver. Results: Notch signaling was found to be upregulated at the peak of oval cell induction during 2AAF-PH alone. Treatment with GSI XX led to interruption of the Notch signal, as shown by a decrease in expression of Hes1. While there was a robust oval cell response seen at day 11 post-PH, there was a measurable delay in differentiation when Notch was inhibited. This was confirmed morphologically as well as by immunohistochemistry for the oval cell markers, ¦Á-fetoprotein, OV-6, and CK19. The hepatocytes seen at day 22 demonstrated an enhanced hepatocellular mitoinhibition index (p21Waf1/Ki67), suggestive of dysregulated proliferation and cell cycle progression. Moreover, these hepatocytes exhibited decreased expression of hepatocyte functional markers, such as cytochrome P450 and glucose-6-phosphatase-¦Á. Conclusion: Taken together, these results identify the Notch signaling pathway as a potent regulator of differentiation and proliferation in oval cells, which is necessary for functional repair of the liver by oval cells.
%K Notch
%K oval cells
%K liver
%K regeneration
%K differentiation
%U https://www.dovepress.com/inhibition-of-notch-signaling-affects-hepatic-oval-cell-response-in-ra-peer-reviewed-article-HMER