%0 Journal Article
%T Effect of resting pressure on the estimate of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance
%A Kennet Andersson
%A Nina Sundstr£¿m
%A Jan Malm
%A Anders Eklund
%J Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
%D 2011
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/2045-8118-8-15
%X Sixty-three patients that underwent a constant pressure infusion protocol as part of their preoperative evaluation for normal pressure hydrocephalus, were included (age 70.3 ¡À 10.8 years (mean ¡À SD)). The analysis was performed without (Cexcl Pr) and with (Cincl Pr) Pr. The estimates were compared using Bland-Altman plots and paired sample t-tests (p < 0.05 considered significant).Mean Cout for the 63 patients was: Cexcl Pr = 7.0 ¡À 4.0 (mean ¡À SD) ¦Ìl/(s kPa) and Cincl Pr = 9.1 ¡À 4.3 ¦Ìl/(s kPa) and Rout was 19.0 ¡À 9.2 and 17.7 ¡À 11.3 mmHg/ml/min, respectively. There was a positive correlation between methods (r = 0.79, n = 63, p < 0.01). The difference, ¦¤Cout= -2.1 ¡À 2.7 ¦Ìl/(s kPa) between methods was significant (p < 0.01) and ¦¤Rout was 1.2 ¡À 8.8 mmHg/ml/min). The Bland-Altman plot visualized that the variation around the mean difference was similar all through the range of measured values and there was no correlation between ¦¤Cout and Cout.The difference between Cout estimates, obtained from analyses with or without Pr, needs to be taken into consideration when comparing results from studies using different infusion test protocols. The study suggests variation in CSF formation rate, variation in venous pressure or a pressure dependent Cout as possible causes for the deviation from the CSF absorption model seen in some patients.Patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) are treated with and often improved by a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt that changes the dynamics of the CSF system [1-4]. In order to assist in the selection of patients likely to benefit from shunt surgery, predictive tests are performed [5]. One such test is the infusion test. It measures changes in intracranial pressure due to infusion or withdrawal of Ringer solution. For clinical interpretation, the relation between pressure and flow obtained during an infusion test must be quantified into accessible parameters, i.e. a model of the CSF system is needed.In the early seventies, Davson pre
%U http://www.fluidsbarrierscns.com/content/8/1/15