%0 Journal Article
%T Extra-Mediterranean refugia: The rule and not the exception?
%A Thomas Schmitt
%A Zoltš¢n Varga
%J Frontiers in Zoology
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1742-9994-9-22
%X The biogeography of the western Palearctic is quite complex and therefore a fascinating and challenging research subject [1-8]. Scientists, even about 50£¿years ago, distinguished three major faunal components in Europe (Mediterranean, Siberian, arctic and/or alpine), but the interpretation of the underlying biogeographical processes behind these faunal elements has considerably changed since then, e.g. [8-13]. Furthermore, the understanding of climatic and other environmental conditions during glaciations has substantially deepened, e.g. [14-19].By the time of de Lattin [4], the existence of Mediterranean faunal elements was largely acknowledged (e.g. the ¡°holothermic¡± faunal elements of Rebel [20]). These elements were thought to have exclusively survived the ice ages in the Mediterranean region, which was divided into nine sub-centres [21] composed of several core areas (German: Arealkerne [2]). Depending on the postglacial expansion out of these refugia and differentiation centres, two basic types were distinguished: (i) stationary elements which did not essentially enlarge their distributions northwards during the postglacial period and (ii) expansive elements largely expanding their ranges beyond their Mediterranean refuge areas, frequently as far north as southern Scandinavia and often showing peripherally isolated populations (subspecies) at the northern boundary of their range e.g. [4] (Figure 1a).Furthermore, the existence of large ice age distributions in the zonal periglacial belt was suggested for the species with arctic, alpine or arctic-alpine distributions followed by postglacial retreat to high mountain areas in the South and/or the high latitudes in the North. Retreat into both directions was interpreted as the reason for the arctic-alpine disjunctions today [22,23]. However, local endemics e.g. in the Alps were interpreted (at least partly) as in situ survival e.g. at nunataks [23] and/or in some marginal areas of the Alps (¡°massifs de refuge¡±, [24
%K Phylogeography
%K Refugia
%K Faunal types
%K Last Glacial Maximum (LGM)
%K Postglacial
%K Range expansions
%K Range shifts
%K Mediterranean
%K Continental
%K Siberian
%U http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/9/1/22