%0 Journal Article
%T A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework
%A Camille H Raynes-Greenow
%A Adrienne Gordon
%A Qiushuang Li
%A Jon A Hyett
%J BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
%D 2013
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1471-2393-13-32
%X Using a cross-sectional design we identified women during routine antenatal care at a tertiary referral hospital, in Sydney, Australia. Eligible women were pregnant ¡Ý£¿28 weeks, carrying a single child, >£¿18 years old, and with sufficient English literacy to self-complete a questionnaire. Post-natally the medical records were reviewed and demographic, pregnancy and fetal outcome data were extracted. Text responses to questions regarding maternal descriptions of fetal movements throughout pregnancy, were analysed using thematic analysis in an explicit process.156 women participated. There was a general pattern to fetal movement descriptions with increasing gestation, beginning with words such as ¡°gentle¡±, to descriptions of ¡°strong¡± and ¡°limb¡± movements, and finally to ¡°whole body¡± movements. Women perceived and described qualitative changes to fetal movements that changed throughout gestation. The majority (83%) reported that they were asked to assess fetal movements in an implicit qualitative method during their antenatal care. In contrast, only 16% regularly counted fetal movements and many described counting as confusing and reported that the advice they had received on counting differed.This is the first study to use qualitative analysis to identify that pregnant women perceive fetal movements and can describe them in a relatively homogenous way throughout pregnancy that follow a general pattern of fetal growth and development. These findings suggest that women¡¯s perception of fetal wellbeing based on their own assessment of fetal movement is used in an ad hoc method in antenatal care by clinicians.Regular fetal activity perceived by pregnant women has long been regarded as a sign of fetal wellbeing [1] and continues to be used by women and clinicians [2]. Decreased fetal movement has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes including stillbirth [3]. Physiological studies of fetal activity have found associations between decreased fetal movement and poor peri
%K Pregnancy
%K Fetal movement
%K Qualitative analysis
%K Cross-sectional study
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/13/32