%0 Journal Article
%T Review of the evidence base for ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation to climate change
%A Robert Munroe
%A Dilys Roe
%A Nathalie Doswald
%A Tom Spencer
%A Iris M£¿ller
%A Bhaskar Vira
%A Hannah Reid
%A Andreas Kontoleon
%A Alessandra Giuliani
%A Ivan Castelli
%A Jen Stephens
%J Environmental Evidence
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/2047-2382-1-13
%X This protocol details the methodology to be used to conduct a systematic map of peer-reviewed published journal papers and a limited selection of grey literature, to give a methodical overview of the state of the evidence base for EbA effectiveness, and to identify the current knowledge gaps. It addresses the following question: What is the state of the evidence base regarding the ability of ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation to help people adapt to the impacts of climate change?Adaptation to climate change may be achieved in many different ways. One way is through ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation (EbA) ¨C defined by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2nd Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on Biodiversity and Climate Change [1] as ¡®the use of biodiversity and ecosystem services to help people adapt to the adverse effects of climate change¡¯. This definition was elaborated by the CBD 10th Conference of the Parties (CoP) in October 2010, as including ¡®sustainable management, conservation and restoration of ecosystems, as part of an overall adaptation strategy that takes into account the multiple social, economic and cultural co-benefits for local communities¡¯ [2].EbA is being enthusiastically promoted by conservation and development organisations that recognise the integral relationship between ecosystems and livelihoods and the threat that climate change poses to these. As a result there are numerous anecdotal case studies of its apparent success describing how local communities are already practicing EbA [3-6]. However, such case studies largely lack a scientific assessment that provides reliable and robust evidence indicating how effective these approaches are [7]. In particular, there are very few quantitative assessments of EbA effectiveness which use controls to examine the impact of the intervention, and few which provide plausible counterfactual arguments about likely causal mechanisms involved. There are also few case studies on either the
%K Climate change
%K Adaptation
%K Ecosystem management
%K Conservation
%K Biodiversity
%K Ecosystem services
%K Systematic map
%K Ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation
%K Ecosystem-based adaptation
%U http://www.environmentalevidencejournal.org/content/1/1/13