%0 Journal Article
%T Comparison of methods for measuring and assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in terrestrial carbon pools. How do the accuracy and precision of current methods compare? A systematic review protocol
%A Gillian Petrokofsky
%A Hideki Kanamaru
%A Fr¨¦d¨¦ric Achard
%A Scott J Goetz
%A Hans Joosten
%A Peter Holmgren
%A Aleksi Lehtonen
%A Mary CS Menton
%A Andrew S Pullin
%A Martin Wattenbach
%J Environmental Evidence
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/2047-2382-1-6
%X A systematic review will compare methods of assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in key land use categories, including, forest land, cropland, grassland, and wetlands, in terrestrial carbon pools that can be accounted for under the Kyoto protocol (above- ground biomass, below-ground biomass, dead wood, litter and soil carbon). Assessing carbon in harvested wood products will not be considered in this review.Developing effective mitigation strategies to reduce carbon emissions and equitable adaptation strategies to cope with increasing global temperatures will rely on robust scientific information that is free from biases imposed by national and commercial interests. A systematic review of the methods used for assessing carbon stocks and carbon stock changes will contribute to the transparent analysis of complex and often contradictory science.Land use and land cover changes, including legal and illegal deforestation, are amongst the most important factors that contribute to the social and environmental challenges facing mankind in the 21st century. Deforestation alone is responsible for about 12% of the world¡¯s anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, whereas another 6% stems from peat oxidation and fires on degraded peatland areas [1]. The combined effects of logging and forest regrowth on abandoned land are responsible for 10¨C25% of global human-induced emissions [2,3]. Annual emissions from deforestation in Indonesia and Brazil equal four-fifths of the annual reduction target of the Kyoto Protocol [4].Linking deforestation with climate change as a mitigation action was one of the key decisions of the thirteenth Conference of the Parties (COP) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The Bali Action Plan agreed:¡°Enhanced national/international action on mitigation of climate change, including, inter alia, consideration of¡­policy approaches and positive incentives on issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and
%U http://www.environmentalevidencejournal.org/content/1/1/6