%0 Journal Article
%T The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement
%A Victoria Borg Debono
%A Shiyuan Zhang
%A Chenglin Ye
%A James Paul
%A Aman Arya
%A Lindsay Hurlburt
%A Yamini Murthy
%A Lehana Thabane
%J BMC Anesthesiology
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1471-2253-12-13
%X We systematically reviewed RCTs used within an anesthesiology related post-operative pain management meta-analysis. We included all of the 23 RCTs used, all of which were parallel design that addressed the use of femoral nerve block in improving outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Data abstraction was done independently by two reviewers. The two main outcomes were: 1) 15 point overall quality of reporting score (OQRS) based on the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and 2) 3 point key methodological item score (KMIS) based on allocation concealment, blinding and intention-to-treat analysis.Twenty-three RCTs were included. The median OQRS was 9.0 (Interquartile Range£¿=£¿3). A multivariable regression analysis did not show any significant association between OQRS or KMIS and our four predictor variables hypothesized to improve reporting. The direction and magnitude of our results when compared to similar studies suggest that the sample size and impact factor are associated with improved key methodological item reporting.The quality of reporting of RCTs used within an anesthesia related meta-analysis is poor to moderate. The information gained from this study should be used by journals to register the urgency for RCTs to be clear and transparent in reporting to help make literature accessible and comparable.
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2253/12/13/abstract