%0 Journal Article
%T Is Decentralization Leading to "Real" Decision-Making Power for Forest-dependent Communities? Case Studies from Mexico and Brazil
%A Reem F. Hajjar
%A Robert A. Kozak
%A John L. Innes
%J Ecology and Society
%D 2012
%I The Resilience Alliance
%R 10.5751/es-04570-170112
%X Decentralization of forest governance has been promoted as a way to conserve forests more effectively, while also improving rural and forest-dependent livelihoods. Prior to assessing the consequences of this decentralization trend, there is a need to critically examine the degree to which decentralization of forest management decision making is actually happening. In particular, it is unclear whether communities are securing legal authority and/or decision-making power over the forests on which they depend. This study uses case studies of community forestry in Brazil and Mexico to examine the amount of decision-making power communities and smallholders have received over forest resources. A framework for assessment is developed that identifies criteria of relevance to community members' rights and day-to-day activities. We found that in both countries the government maintains significant control over forest resources through heavy regulation of extraction, but that communities have increasing control over day-to-day forest management decisions. We conclude by posing questions on the appropriate levels of decentralization for optimal outcomes.
%K Brazil
%K community forestry
%K decentralization
%K forest-dependent communities
%K forest management authority
%K Mexico
%U http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss1/art12/