%0 Journal Article
%T Autoriaus pozicijos adverbialai ir adverbializacija lietuvi  mokslo kalboje. Stance adverbials and adverbialization in Lithuanian academic discourse
%A Antanas Smetona
%A Aurelija Usonien£¿
%J Kalbotyra
%D 2012
%I Vilnius University
%X The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate the necessity of distinguishing a semantic-functional class of stance adverbials in Lithuanian. Following Biber et al. (1999) and Hasselg rd (2010) an attempt is made to show that alongside circumstance adverbials there are also linking adverbials and stance adverbials in Lithuanian. The means of realization of stance adverbials in Lithuanian is not only adverbs but also so called modal words (galb¨±t ¡®maybe¡¯, tikriausiai ¡®most probably¡¯), various particles (taigi ¡®therefore¡¯, visgi ¡®still¡¯, ¡®nevertheless¡¯), CTPs (manoma ¡®it is believed¡¯, nat¨±ralu ¡®naturally¡¯), various adverbial clauses (kaip matyti ¡®as it is seen, as one can see¡¯, kaip  inoma ¡®as is known¡¯) but also prepositional phrases (pasak X ¡®according to X¡¯). The article devotes much attention to the semantic classification of the basic types of stance adverbials, which has been illustrated by the language data collected from the Corpus of Academic Lithuanian (Corpus Academicum Lithuanicum ¨C CorALit ¨C http://coralit.lt). The paper also touches upon the process of adverbialization and its relationship to grammaticalization which presupposes the desemanticization and (inter)subjectivization of the linguistic expressions under analysis. Many Lithuanian verbal and adjectival CTPs like  inoma ¡®it is known¡¯, suprantama ¡®it is understood¡¯, tarkim ¡®let¡¯s say¡¯ can develop into stance adverbials and further into discourse markers by losing any links to the original lexical meaning of the verb they have evolved from. ------ Straipsnio tikslas parodyti, kod l reik t  ir kod l galima b¨±t  skirti semantin -funkcin  adverbial  klas  lietuvi  kalboje. Pastaroji n ra tapatinama su prieveiksmiais kaip tradicine kalbos dalimi gramatikoje ar aplinkyb mis kaip tradicine sakinio dalimi sintaks je. Be to, n ra kvestionuojamas aptariam  kalbos rei kini  statusas kalbos dali  ar sakinio dali  po i¨±riu. Si¨±loma atkreipti d mes    kalboje objektyviai egzistuojan i  straipsnyje aptariam  rai kos priemoni  ai kinimo  vairov . J  semantin -funkcin  charakteristika netelpa   prieveiksmi  (DLKG 1996, 422-429; Valeckien  1998, 169-170), aplinkybi  (DLKG 1996, 527-553; Valeckien  1998, 55-66) bei modifikuojam j  dalely i  (Valeckien  1998, 191) reik mi  ir tip  klasifikacij .  ios semantin s-funkcin s klas s aptarimas remiasi autoriaus pozicijos rai kos tyrimu lietuvi  mokslo kalboje1. Visi kalbos duomenys surinkti i  Lietuvi  mokslo kalbos tekstyno (Corpus Academicum Lithuanicum: http://coralit.lt/). Darbe trumpai ap velgiami akademinio diskurso ypatumai ir autoriaus pozicijos vaidmuo u
%K adverbialai
%K adverbializacija
%K akademinis diskursas
%K autoriaus pozicija
%K lietuvi  mokslo kalbos tekstynas
%K adverbials
%K adverbialization
%K academic discourse
%K author stance
%K the corpus of academic Lithuanian
%U http://www.kalbotyra.flf.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Kalbotyra_64_124-139.pdf