%0 Journal Article
%T On some morphological properties of the adjective in Gothic. D l got  kalbos b¨±dvard io morfologini  ypatybi
%A Art¨±ras Ratkus
%J Kalbotyra
%D 2009
%I Vilnius University
%X The morphology of Gothic, as well as that of other older Germanic languages, has traditionally been analysed in phonological terms, with classifications that reflect earlier stages in the development of Germanic. This paper represents a pioneering attempt at applying the ¡®canonical¡¯ approach to the analysis of older Germanic, with a view to producing an adequate synchronic analysis of the morphological properties of the Gothic adjective. It is demonstrated that the traditional separation of strong and weak forms is synchronically unreasonable, and determination represents a non-canonical morphosyntactic feature of the Gothic adjective. Even though the traditional stem-class labels are obsolete from a synchronic point of view, synchronic form variation within Gothic adjective paradigms warrants distinguishing four inflectional classes, a classification which coincides with the traditional philological taxonomy. In addition to inflectional class, Gothic adjectives have been found to have stem indexing and syncretic index features. ------ Got  kalbos ir kit  sen j  german  kalb  morfologija tradici kai nagrin jama remiantis fonologiniais kriterijais. Tokioje tradicin je form  klasifikacijoje atsispindi ankstesnieji german  kalb  raidos etapai; taigi, toks analiz s metodas ¨C sinchroni kai neaktualus. Siekiant nuosekliai apra yti got  kalbos b¨±dvard i  morfologinius po ymius sinchroniniu po i¨±riu, straipsnyje taikomas kanoninis metodas. Pirmiausia pristatoma  kanono¡° s voka, apibr  iamas kanoni kumas fleksij  morfologijoje ir pateikiama gryn j  morfologini  po ymi  tipologija. Kanonas, tai ¨C abstrakcija, kuri yra daugelio kanonini  kriterij  konvergencijos rezultatas. Nustatant kalbos rei kinio kanon , i ple iamos rei kinio teorin s ribos ir sukuriama kanonin  erdv , kurioje galima logi kai ir nuosekliai klasifikuoti rei kinio aprai kas. Remiantis kanonine metodologija straipsnyje  rodin jama, kad tradicinis stipri j  (neapibr  t j ) ir silpn j  (apibr  t j ) b¨±dvard i  paradigm  atskyrimas yra sinchroni kai nepateisinamas, kadangi determinacijos (apibr  tumo/neapibr  tumo) kategorija, tai ¨C pilnavert  morfosintaksin  b¨±dvard i  kategorija. Skirtingai nuo skai iaus, linksnio ir gimin s kategorij , determinacija laikytina nekanoni ka. Argumentuojama, kad sinchroniniu po i¨±riu tradicin  b¨±dvard i  klasifikacija pagal istorin  kamiengal  ¨C nebeaktuali, kadangi patys kamiengaliai paradigmose sinchroni kai nebeap iuopiami. Nepaisant to, fleksij  sistemoje egzistuojanti leksi kai determinuota form   vairov  sudaro prielaid  i skirti keturias b¨±dvard i  klases, kur
%K Gothic
%K weak adjective
%K strong adjective
%K canonical typology
%K morphological features
%K determination
%U http://www.kalbotyra.flf.vu.lt/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Kalbotyra_61_85-101.pdf