%0 Journal Article
%T Why biogeography matters: historical biogeography vs. phylogeography and community phylogenetics for inferring ecological and evolutionary processes
%A John J. Wiens
%J Frontiers of Biogeography
%D 2012
%I International Biogeography Society
%X Phylogenetic and phylogeographic approaches have become widespread in evolutionary biology, ecology, and biogeography.  However, analyses that incorporate inferences from historical biogeography (e.g. timing of colonization of a region) may be essential to answer the most important large-scale questions in these fields, but they remain infrequently used.  I focus on two examples here.  First, I argue that understanding the origins of biodiversity hotspots (and other high-diversity regions) requires comparing the timing of biogeographic colonization and diversification rates among regions.  In contrast, phylogeographic studies (analyses within species within a region) may themselves say little about why a region is diverse relative to others.  Second, incorporating historical biogeograpy can help address the processes that determine community species richness and structure, such as dispersal, in-situ trait evolution, and in-situ speciation.  In contrast, the widespread ¡°community phylogenetics¡± approach (focusing on relatedness of species in communities) may have limited ability to explain community richness and structure.
%K biodiversity hotspot
%K biogeography
%K community ecology
%K community phylogenetics
%K phylogeny
%K phylogeography
%K species richness
%U http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5n41f6cc