%0 Journal Article
%T The Dialectics of Power, Rights, and Responsibility
%A Ranhilio Callangan Aquino
%J Kritike : an Online Journal of Philosophy
%D 2009
%I kritike.org
%X It is not uncommon for a treatment of rights to be treatment against power with some concession to the responsibilities that a tutelary of rights enjoys. We owe it to legal philosophers of the Scholastic persuasion who recognized rights as the entitlements that allow a person to fulfill duties¡ªwhether these arise from nature or from contract. In this sense rights were subordinate to and enjoyed for the sake of duties that one had. One may debate this way of putting things, but it had the marked advantage of clarity and showed the internal connection between rights and duties. Also in the scholastic anatomy of rights, there was such a thing as the ¡°term¡± of the right¡ªhe against whom the right could be claimed, and therefore he or she upon whom a duty was incumbent to desist from transgressing the right of the tutelary. In this sense a ¡°right to¡± was concomitantly ¡°power against,¡± but power, in the sense of claim or entitlement. For the power to enforce, one had to look to what scholastic philosophers called the ¡°title¡± of the right¡ªand this could be natural law, positive law that, of course, included contracts.
%K Power
%K Jurgen Habermas
%K Paul Ricoeur
%U http://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_5/aquino_june2009.pdf