%0 Journal Article
%T Negative Happiness
%A Adam Barkman
%J Kritike : an Online Journal of Philosophy
%D 2009
%I kritike.org
%X In this paper, I will compare the philosophies of the Buddha and Epicurus. Unusual? Yes. But my intention herein is not a general comparison; rather, I want to explore to what extent these two men accepted what I call ˇ°negative happiness.ˇ± What is negative, and by extension, positive, happiness? I think we can prepare ourselves for this distinction with two analogous distinctions: (1) the distinction between positive and negative freedom, wherein positive freedom sees true freedom as internal control over oneself, while negative freedom sees true freedom as the lack of external coercion, and (2) the distinction between charity and unselfishness, wherein charity stresses selfdenial,though not as an end in itself, whereas unselfishness emphasizes notprimarily doing good things for others but rather going without them ourselves. Thus, in regard to positive and negative happiness, we can say that while positive happiness sees true happiness as a substantial good that makes virtue a constituent of happiness and regards happiness as something more than the avoidance of suffering, negative happiness sees true happiness as simply the absence of suffering.
%K Negative happiness
%K Buddhism
%K Epircurianism
%U http://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_5/barkman_june2009.pdf