%0 Journal Article
%T Characterizing low affinity epibatidine binding to ¦Á4¦Â2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with ligand depletion and nonspecific binding
%A Alexandra M Person
%A Gregg B Wells
%J BMC Biophysics
%D 2011
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/2046-1682-4-19
%X Computer simulations of binding revealed complexities beyond fitting total binding for characterizing the second, low affinity site of ¦Á4¦Â2 nAChR. First, distinguishing low-affinity specific binding from nonspecific binding was a potential problem with saturation data. Varying the maximum concentration of [3H]epibatidine, simultaneously fitting independently measured nonspecific binding, and varying ¦Á4¦Â2 nAChR concentration were effective remedies. Second, ligand depletion helped identify the low affinity site when nonspecific binding was significant in saturation or competition data, contrary to a common belief that ligand depletion always is detrimental. Third, measuring nonspecific binding without ¦Á4¦Â2 nAChR distinguished better between nonspecific binding and low-affinity specific binding under some circumstances of competitive binding than did presuming nonspecific binding to be residual [3H]epibatidine binding after adding a large concentration of cold competitor. Fourth, nonspecific binding of a heterologous competitor changed estimates of high and low inhibition constants but did not change the ratio of those estimates.Investigating the low affinity site of ¦Á4¦Â2 nAChR with equilibrium binding when ligand depletion and nonspecific binding are present likely needs special attention to experimental design and data interpretation beyond fitting total binding data. Manipulation of maximum ligand and receptor concentrations and intentionally increasing ligand depletion are potentially helpful approaches.Ligand depletion can significantly affect estimates for dissociation (Kd) or inhibition (Ki) constants from equilibrium binding data of epibatidine (EB) and ¦Á4¦Â2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) because of the high affinity of EB (Kd1¡Ö10 pM). Errors from ligand depletion arise from inappropriately assuming that free ligand concentration equals total ligand concentration while using total ligand concentration as the independent variable for modeling the bind
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/2046-1682/4/19