%0 Journal Article
%T Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
%A Brettschneider
%A Christian
%A L¨¹hmann
%A Dagmar
%A Raspe
%A Heiner
%J GMS Health Technology Assessment
%D 2011
%I German Medical Science, D¨¹sseldorf
%X Background: ¡°Patient-Reported Outcome¡± (PRO) is used as an umbrella term for different concepts for measuring subjectively perceived health status e. g. as treatment effects. Their common characteristic is, that the appraisal of the health status is reported by the patient himself. In order to describe the informative value of PRO in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) first an overview of concepts, classifications and methods of measurement is given. The overview is complemented by an empirical analysis of clinical trials and HTA-reports on rheumatoid arthritis and breast cancer in order to report on type, frequency and consequences of PRO used in these documents. Methods: For both issues systematic reviews of the literature have been performed. The search for methodological literature covers the publication period from 1990 to 2009, the search for clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis and breast cancer covers the period 2005 to 2009. Both searches were performed in the medical databases of the German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI). The search for HTA-reports and methodological papers of HTA-agencies was performed in the CRD-Databases (CRD = Centre for Reviews and Dissemination) and by handsearching the websites of INAHTA member agencies (INAHTA = International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment). For all issues specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCT) was assessed by a modified version of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. For the methodological part information extraction from the literature is structured by the report¡¯s chapters, for the empirical part data extraction sheets were constructed. All information is summarized in a qualitative manner. Results: Concerning the methodological issues the literature search retrieved 158 documents (87 documents related to definition or classification, 125 documents related to operationalisation of PRO). For the empirical analyses 225 RCT (rheumatoid arthritis: 77; breast cancer: 148) and 40 HTA-reports and method papers were found. The analysis of the methodological literature confirms the role of PRO as an umbrella term for a variety of different concepts. The newest classification system facilitates the description of PRO measures by construct, target population and the method of measurement. Steps of operationalisation involve defining a conceptual framework, instrument development, exploration of measurement properties or, possibly, the modification of existing instruments. Seven out o
%K patient-reported outcome
%K patient reported outcome
%K quality of life
%K rheumatoid arthritis
%K carcinoma of the breast
%K breast cancer
%K clinical trials
%K clinical studies
%K Health Technology Assessment
%K concept
%K HTA report
%K HTA-report
%K endpoint determination
%K efficiency
%K efficacy
%K effectiveness
%K cost-effectiveness
%K costs
%K cost analysis
%K cost-benefit-analyses
%K cost control
%K medical costs
%K sickness costs
%K cost-cutting
%K cost reduction
%K systematic review
%K HTA
%K technology assessment
%K medical
%U http://www.egms.de/en/journals/hta/2011-7/hta000092.shtml