%0 Journal Article
%T Lorsqu¡¯un cas de narcolepsie met ¨¤ l¡¯¨¦preuve la lutte antidopage When narcolepsy challenges anti-doping programs. Time of controversy as a reconfiguration of argumentation processes
%A Julie Demeslay
%A S¨¦bastien Buisine
%J Temporalit¨¦s
%D 2012
%I Laboratoire Printemps
%X Cycliste professionnel depuis plusieurs ann¨¦es, Franck Bouyer voit son quotidien changer en 2003, quand il apprend qu¡¯il est atteint du syndrome de G¨¦lineau. Cette maladie contraint le sportif ¨¤ prendre tous les jours un traitement stimulant pour stopper la r¨¦p¨¦tition de crises de narcolepsie, de cataplexie et d¡¯hallucinations dont il est victime. Toutefois, le m¨¦dicament qui lui permet de retrouver un ¨¦tat physiologique   normal   est r¨¦pertori¨¦ par l¡¯Agence mondiale antidopage parmi les produits interdits en comp¨¦tition. Dans le cadre du processus naissant d¡¯harmonisation des proc¨¦dures de lutte contre le dopage, il appara t alors que la r¨¦alit¨¦ de son m¨¦tier et celle de sa maladie ne sont plus en ad¨¦quation. Les demandes d¡¯Autorisations d¡¯usage ¨¤ des fins th¨¦rapeutiques formul¨¦es par le sportif donnent ¨¤ lire une dispute dont la cl ture est singuli¨¨re et provisoire. L¡¯article aborde la mani¨¨re dont se transforme et se reconfigure cette dispute, qui bascule au fil du temps dans le r¨¦gime de la controverse puis celui de l¡¯affaire, mais il rend compte aussi des logiques d¡¯actions, des jeux d¡¯acteurs et d¡¯arguments d¨¦ploy¨¦s pour juger de la suite ¨¤ donner ¨¤ la carri¨¨re professionnelle du cycliste. As a professional cyclist with a long career, Franck Bouyer saw his life change in 2003 when he learned that he was suffering from Gelineau¡¯s syndrome. The disease forced the athlete to take a stimulating treatment every day to stop the recurrence of attacks of narcolepsy, cataplexy and hallucinations. However, the medicine which allows him to experience a ¡°normal¡± physiological state is listed with the World Anti-Doping Agency among prohibited substances in competition. As part of the emerging process of harmonization of procedures for the fight against doping, an inadequacy appears between the realities of his job and his disease. His requests for Therapeutic Use Exemptions, in order to be able to carry on with his career, led to a conflict with a unique, temporary conclusion. The article discusses how time transforms and reconfigures the conflict itself, which switches from the regime of the controversy to the case. Besides, this article brings to light the logics of actions, actors and arguments processes to assess the follow-up of the professional cyclist¡¯s career.
%K time
%K professional cycling
%K doping
%K sports
%K quarrel
%K qualifications
%K expertise
%K argumentation
%K temps
%K cyclisme professionnel
%K lutte antidopage
%K dispute
%K qualifications
%K expertises
%K argumentation
%U http://temporalites.revues.org/2096