%0 Journal Article
%T Hiina keisririigi valitsemisviisi v imalikust erip rast Sui d¨¹nastia ajal (581-618
%A Tarmo Kulmar
%J M£¿etagused. H¨¹perajakiri
%D 2011
%I Eesti Kirjandusmuuseum and Eesti Folkloori Instituut
%X The article attempts to study whether the Chinese Empire at the time of the Sui Dynasty could be considered an early totalitarian state or not. The analysis, based on historical data, proceeds from a scheme of an early totalitarian state devised by the author and reveals that the Sui state does have the characteristics of an early totalitarianstate with regard to historical-political reasons and foreign policy related factors, and, to a great extent, in administration and economy, whereas the relevant characteristics are indirectly or very slightly explicit in the field of social life. The features of early totalitarianism, within the governance method of the Sui state, aregenerally not evident with regard to legal order and ideology. In conclusion, it is highly probable that the Sui Empire corresponds to an early totalitarian governing system,bearing in mind the external characteristics of state power, not the internal ones. This is a relevant and fundamental difference between the Chinese Qin Empire (221¨C207 BC), as a purely early totalitarian state, and the Sui Empire as an emerging early totalitarian state. Thus, the Sui Empire was probably becoming an early totalitarianstate, however, this process was discontinued due to the perishing of the dynasty.
%K early totalitarianism
%K history of China
%K sinology
%K state power
%K Sui dynasty
%U http://www.folklore.ee/tagused/nr47/kulmar.pdf