%0 Journal Article
%T Kuidas me m istame   p eva
%A Asta £¿im
%J M£¿etagused. H¨¹perajakiri
%D 2011
%I Eesti Kirjandusmuuseum and Eesti Folkloori Instituut
%X The article focuses on the notion   p ev (¡®twenty-four hours, day and night¡¯) and the subdivisions of the term in the Estonian language. Attempt is made to ascertain how Estonians render meaning to   p ev and what are the content-wide considerations for periodising the   p ev and p ev (¡®day¡¯), and whether the reasons for periodisation indifferent languages are similar or not. In the Estonian language, the period of daylight is understood as work-time. Proceeding from this standpoint, hommik (¡®morning¡¯) as a productive section of the day is segmented in a detailed manner and time-wise lasts until lunch. The evening ( htu), on the contrary, is understood, besides time-wise notion, as the finishing of work and transfer to the rest period from any time since lunch (kell kaks j  di juba  htule (¡®they called it a day already at two o¡¯clock¡¯);  htule saadi alles loojangu eel (¡®they finished work only before sunset¡¯).
%K day and night
%K lexicon
%K phraseology
%K real and naive worldview
%K semantics of images
%U http://www.folklore.ee/tagused/nr48/oim.pdf