%0 Journal Article
%T Gender in the Substance of Chemistry, Part 2: An Agenda for Theory
%A ¨˘gnes Kov¨˘cs
%J Hyle : International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry
%D 2012
%I HYLE Publications, Karlsruhe and University of Karlsruhe
%X Feminist science criticism has mostly focused on the theories of the life sciences, while the few studies about gender and the physical sciences locate gender in the practice, and not in the theories, of these fields. Arguably, the reason for this asymmetry is that the conceptual and methodological tools developed by (feminist) science studies are not suited to analyze the hard sciences for gender-related values in their content. My central claim is that a conceptual, rather than an empirical, analysis is needed; one should be looking for general metaphysical principles which serve as the conceptual foundation for the scientific theory, and which, in other contexts, constitute the philosophical foundations of a worldview that legitimates social inequalities. This position is not being advocated anywhere in the philosophy of science, but its elements are to be found in Helen Longino's theory of science, and in the social epistemology and ontology of Georg Luk¨˘cs.
%K philosophy of chemistry
%K feminist science studies
%K sociology of scientific knowledge
%K social epistemology
%K Helen Longino
%K standpoint theory
%K Georg Luk¨˘cs
%U http://www.hyle.org/journal/issues/18-2/kovacs2.pdf