%0 Journal Article
%T The four principles: Can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making?
%A Katie Page
%J BMC Medical Ethics
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1472-6939-13-10
%X The Analytic Hierarchy Process was used as a tool for the measurement of the principles. Four scenarios, which involved conflicts between the medical ethical principles, were presented to participants who then made judgments about the ethicality of the action in the scenario, and their intentions to act in the same manner if they were in the situation.Individual preferences for these medical ethical principles can be measured using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. This technique provides a useful tool in which to highlight individual medical ethical values. On average, individuals have a significant preference for non-maleficence over the other principles, however, and perhaps counter-intuitively, this preference does not seem to relate to applied ethical judgements in specific ethical dilemmas.People state they value these medical ethical principles but they do not actually seem to use them directly in the decision making process. The reasons for this are explained through the lack of a behavioural model to account for the relevant situational factors not captured by the principles. The limitations of the principles in predicting ethical decision making are discussed.
%K Ethical principles
%K Hierarchies
%K Medical ethics
%K Analytic hierarchy process
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/13/10/abstract