%0 Journal Article
%T Analysis of Xq27-28 linkage in the international consortium for prostate cancer genetics (ICPCG) families
%A Joan E Bailey-Wilson
%A Erica J Childs
%A Cheryl D Cropp
%A Daniel J Schaid
%A Jianfeng Xu
%A Nicola J Camp
%A Lisa A Cannon-Albright
%A James M Farnham
%A Asha George
%A Isaac Powell
%A John D Carpten
%A Graham G Giles
%A John L Hopper
%A Gianluca Severi
%A Dallas R English
%A William D Foulkes
%A Lovise M£¿hle
%A P£¿l M£¿ller
%A Ros Eeles
%A Douglas Easton
%A Michelle Guy
%A Stephen Edwards
%A Michael D Badzioch
%A Alice S Whittemore
%A Ingrid Oakley-Girvan
%A Chih-Lin Hsieh
%A Latchezar Dimitrov
%A Janet L Stanford
%A Danielle M Karyadi
%A Kerry Deutsch
%J BMC Medical Genetics
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1471-2350-13-46
%X Parametric and non-parametric linkage analyses were performed using 26 microsatellite markers in each of 11 groups of multiple-case prostate cancer families from the International Consortium for Prostate Cancer Genetics (ICPCG). Meta-analyses of the resultant family-specific linkage statistics across the entire 1,323 families and in several predefined subsets were then performed.Meta-analyses of linkage statistics resulted in a maximum parametric heterogeneity lod score (HLOD) of 1.28, and an allele-sharing lod score (LOD) of 2.0 in favor of linkage to Xq27-q28 at 138 cM. In subset analyses, families with average age at onset less than 65 years exhibited a maximum HLOD of 1.8 (at 138 cM) versus a maximum regional HLOD of only 0.32 in families with average age at onset of 65 years or older. Surprisingly, the subset of families with only 2¨C3 affected men and some evidence of male-to-male transmission of prostate cancer gave the strongest evidence of linkage to the region (HLOD£¿=£¿3.24, 134 cM). For this subset, the HLOD was slightly increased (HLOD£¿=£¿3.47 at 134 cM) when families used in the original published report of linkage to Xq27-28 were excluded.Although there was not strong support for linkage to the Xq27-28 region in the complete set of families, the subset of families with earlier age at onset exhibited more evidence of linkage than families with later onset of disease. A subset of families with 2¨C3 affected individuals and with some evidence of male to male disease transmission showed stronger linkage signals. Our results suggest that the genetic basis for prostate cancer in our families is much more complex than a single susceptibility locus on the X chromosome, and that future explorations of the Xq27-28 region should focus on the subset of families identified here with the strongest evidence of linkage to this region.
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/13/46/abstract