%0 Journal Article
%T Is MRI better than CT for detecting a vascular component to dementia? A systematic review and meta-analysis
%A Rebecca Beynon
%A Jonathan A.C. Sterne
%A Gordon Wilcock
%A Marcus Likeman
%A Roger M Harbord
%A Margaret P Astin
%A Margaret Burke
%A Alysson Bessell
%A Yoav Ben-Shlomo
%A James Hawkins
%A William Hollingworth
%A Penny F Whiting
%J BMC Neurology
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1471-2377-12-33
%X We searched eight databases and screened reference lists to identify studies addressing the review question. We assessed study quality using QUADAS. We estimated summary diagnostic accuracy according to imaging finding, and ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (RDORs) for MRI versus CT and high versus low risk of bias.We included 7 autopsy and 31 non-autopsy studies. There was little evidence that selective patient enrolment and risk of incorporation bias impacted on diagnostic accuracy (p£¿=£¿0.12 to 0.95). The most widely reported imaging finding was white matter hyperintensities. For CT (11 studies) summary sensitivity and specificity were 71% (95% CI 53%-85%) and 55% (44%-66%). Corresponding figures for MRI (6 studies) were 95% (87%-98%) and 26% (12%-50%). General infarcts was the most specific imaging finding on MRI (96%; 95% CI 94%-97%) and CT (96%; 93%-98%). However, sensitivity was low for both MRI (53%; 36%-70%) and CT (52%; 22% to 80%). No imaging finding had consistently high sensitivity. Based on non-autopsy studies, MRI was more accurate than CT for six of seven imaging findings, but confidence intervals were wide.There is insufficient evidence to suggest that MRI is superior to CT with respect to identifying cerebrovascular changes in autopsy-confirmed and clinical cohorts of VaD, AD, and ¡®mixed dementia¡¯.
%K Dementia
%K CT
%K MRI
%K Diagnosis
%K Systematic review
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/12/33/abstract