%0 Journal Article
%T La investigaci車n de los cr赤menes cometidos en la guerra civil y el franquismo como delito de prevaricaci車n. An芍lisis cr赤tico del auto del Tribunal Supremo de 3 de febrero de 2010 desde la perspectiva del derecho internacional
%A Javier Chinch車n 芍lvarez
%A Lydia Vicente M芍rquez
%J Revista Electr車nica de Estudios Internacionales
%D 2010
%I 
%X In this article we will raise a number of legal considerations, in accordance with the applicable international law, in order to refute the arguments put forward in the decision of the Supreme Court of 3 February 2010 that support the charge for breach of legal duty against Judge Baltasar Garz車n. In particular, we will explain how a correct interpretation of Law 52/2007, the right to an effective remedy, the right to access to justice, the Amnesty Law of 1977, as well as a correct understanding of the concept of crimes against humanity, including enforced disappearances, as per international law, cannot sustain such charges.
%K Duty to investigate
%K right to an effective remedy
%K amnesties
%K crimes against humanity
%K enforced disappearances
%K "Historical Memory"-Transitional Justice
%K Deber de investigar
%K derecho a un recuso efectivo
%K amnist赤as
%K cr赤menes contra la humanidad
%K desaparici車n forzada de personas
%K "Memoria Hist車rica"-Justicia Transicional.
%U http://www.reei.org/index.php/revista/num19/articulos/investigacion-crimenes-cometidos-guerra-civil-franquismo-como-delito-prevaricacion-analisis-critico-auto-tribunal-supremo-3-febrero-2010-desde-perspectiva-derecho-internacional