%0 Journal Article
%T La met¨¢fora filos¨®fica. O de cu¨¢ndo hablan en serio los fil¨®sofos
%A Luis Carrillo C¨¢ceres
%J Revista Observaciones Filos¨®ficas
%D 2008
%I Pontificia Universidad C¨¢tolica de Valpara¨ªso
%X By virtue of the election of certain type of antagonistic entailment between Literature and philosophy, we set out to review how the philosophical metaphor has contributed to the stupidity of the philosopher, whereas the literary metaphor, contributes to the engrandecimiento of the author nonphilosopher. Since, in certain type of philosophy, good number of occasions, the content than is said does not have to do with the declaratory intention of the author, we enunciate the paradox of which if we took in serious to the philosophical text, it sounds to hair seizure and if, on the contrary, we did not take it in serious, that is to say, if when we read the philosophical declaration, we understand that indeed it is an indirect speech, then we have to judge it like literary text; consequently, to take it is not to take it in serious and not to take it in serious is to take it in serious.
%K Metaphor
%K language
%K right
%K language
%K logic
%K philosophy
%K knowledge
%K dialogue
%K poetic
%K hermene¨²tica
%U http://www.observacionesfilosoficas.net/lametaforafilosoficaodecuando.htm