%0 Journal Article
%T Literatura y deconstrucci¨®n: Lectura de Enrique Vila-Matas. Los escombros de la teor¨ªa
%A Antonio Aguilar
%J Revista Observaciones Filos¨®ficas
%D 2010
%I Pontificia Universidad C¨¢tolica de Valpara¨ªso
%X "What is deconstruction?" No answer. While the conversation continues, and now an imperative on the part of I split the narrator. 'No, you do now. "Apparently no answer. If a question does not expect to answer a rhetorical question. The rhetorical question grammatical contrasts the tropological level, producing, by opposing two directions at once, a suspension of reference. Therefore, it is true that the rhetorical question do not expect anything, but it is precisely the opening to an event that negotiates its thetic referentiality. If each text plays and negotiating the suspension of the naive referential referentiality thetic, it is also true that more text does differently, uniquely. That which is announced or promised as literature never gives itself as such, according to Derrida, because literature is to speak only of literature, or literature that was only self-referential would immediately be canceled. There is no literature without a relationship to keep suspended unrelated meaning and reference, you understand that suspension here means suspense, but also dependence. This is not to say that literature has a relationship heteroafectiva solipsistic and herself, who denies the referentiality, or consideration of another, or from something alien to it. In literature, these relations are never stable, its epistemology (-epistemology should be understood in the sense de Man as the problematic relationship between truth and error in the text-) is an epistemology aberrant continuous diversion always powered by the very nature of literature.
%K Literature
%K Deconstruction
%K Enrique Vila-Matas
%K Derrida
%K Literature
%K Epistemology
%U http://www.observacionesfilosoficas.net/litydecons.html