%0 Journal Article
%T The pluripotent history of immunology. A review
%A Neeraja Sankaran
%J Avant : Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
%D 2012
%I Centre for Philosophical Research
%X The historiography of immunology since 1999 is reviewed, in part as a response to claims by historians such as Thomas S derqvist the field was still immature at the time (S derqvist & Stillwell 1999). First addressed are the difficulties, past and present, surrounding the disciplinary definition of immunology, which is followed by a commentary on the recent scholarship devoted to the concept of the immune self. The new literature on broad immunological topics is examined and assessed, and specific charges leveled against the paucity of certain types of histories, e.g. biographical and institutional histories, are evaluated. In conclusion, there are compelling indications that the history of immunology has moved past the initial tentative stages identified in the earlier reviews to become a bustling, pluripotent discipline, much like the subject of its scrutiny, and that it continues to develop in many new and exciting directions.
%K Biographical history
%K Continuity model
%K Danger Model
%K Historiography of Immunology
%K History of Immunology
%K Institutional history
%K Self vs. Non-self model
%U http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/NSankaran-The-pluripotent-_Avant_12012_online.doc.pdf