%0 Journal Article
%T Reforma y contrarreforma laboral en Argentina, cr車nica simple de un proceso pendular
%A Adri芍n Goldin
%J Derecho PUCP
%D 2012
%I Pontificia Universidad Cat車lica del Per迆
%X Labor reform and counter-reform in Argentina, simple chronic of a pendulum process After placing it in the context of the processes of labor reforms produced in Latin America in the early 90＊s (its inspiration, its dynamics, its actors), the article considers in particular the case of Argentina. In that assignment, it examines the labor reforms that took place there from dominant perspectives - external flexibility, internal flexibility, reduction and variation of costs, collective labor relations - confirming a strong deregulated activism in the field of individual relations, while it was verified a high administrative interventionism of decentralized bias with a limited institutional transformation in collective relations. At the end of that decade, it had already been clear that those strategies haven＊t had a virtuous effect on the social labor situation or the labor market. In this context, a new government that comes into power in 2003, leaves without effect a good part of those reforms and instead it undertakes a process of institutional reconfiguration of the legal system of labor protection: a systematic increase of the Living Wage, strengthening of the collective wage bargaining - with the consequent tendential improvement of wages of workers in the formal sector - and, by virtue of parliamentary initiatives, a sequence of introduction of micro-reforms always oriented to increase the protection of workers, which as a whole would have to involve a remarkable recovery of the tutelary bias of labor regulations. El art赤culo analiza la reforma argentina en el contexto de los procesos de las reformas laborales producidas en Am谷rica Latina en la d谷cada de los noventa (su inspiraci車n, su din芍mica, sus actores). En ese cometido, examina las reformas laborales que tuvieron lugar all赤 desde las perspectivas dominantes 〞la flexibilidad externa, la flexibilidad interna, la reducci車n y variabilizaci車n de los costos, las relaciones colectivas del trabajo〞 constat芍ndose un fuerte activismo desregulador en el campo de las relaciones individuales, en tanto se verificaba un alto intervencionismo administrativo de sesgo descentralizador con escasa transformaci車n institucional en el de las relaciones colectivas. Al final de aquella d谷cada hab赤a quedado ya en evidencia que esas estrategias no hab赤an tenido un efecto virtuoso sobre la situaci車n socio-laboral ni sobre el mercado de trabajo. En ese contexto, un nuevo Gobierno, que accede al poder en 2003, deja sin efecto buena parte de aquellas reformas y emprende en cambio un proceso de reconfiguraci車n institucional d
%K reformas laborales
%K Am谷rica Latina
%K Argentina
%K flexibilidad externa
%K flexibilidad interna
%K contrarreforma laboral
%U http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/2826