%0 Journal Article
%T Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines influence the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review protocol
%A Larissa Shamseer
%A Adrienne Stevens
%A Becky Skidmore
%A Lucy Turner
%A Douglas G Altman
%A Allison Hirst
%A John Hoey
%A Anita Palepu
%A Iveta Simera
%A Kenneth F Schulz
%A David Moher
%J Systematic Reviews
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/2046-4053-1-24
%X Guidelines providing a minimum set of items to guide authors in reporting a specific type of research, developed with explicit methodology, and using a consensus process will be identified from an earlier systematic review and from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network¡¯s reporting guidelines library. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Methodology Register and Scopus will be searched for evaluations of those reporting guidelines; relevant evaluations from the recently conducted CONSORT systematic review will also be included. Single data extraction with 10% verification of study characteristics, 20% of outcomes and complete verification of aspects of study validity will be carried out. We will include evaluations of reporting guidelines that assess the completeness of reporting: (1) before and after journal endorsement, and/or (2) between endorsing and non-endorsing journals. For a given guideline, analyses will be conducted for individual and the total sum of items. When possible, standard, pooled effects with 99% confidence intervals using random effects models will be calculated.Evidence on which guidelines have been evaluated and which are associated with improved completeness of reporting is important for various stakeholders, including editors who consider which guidelines to endorse in their journal editorial policies.
%K Reporting guidelines
%K Evaluation
%K Systematic review
%K Completeness of reporting
%U http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/1/1/24/abstract