%0 Journal Article
%T Type of anaesthesia and the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin or dabigatran etexilate in major orthopaedic surgery: pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials
%A Nadia Rosencher
%A Herbert Noack
%A Martin Feuring
%A Andreas Clemens
%A Richard J Friedman
%A Bengt I Eriksson
%J Thrombosis Journal
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1477-9560-10-9
%X Three previously reported trials compared 220£¿mg and 150£¿mg dabigatran etexilate once daily with enoxaparin after knee or hip arthroplasty. A pooled analysis was performed in patients receiving general or neuraxial anaesthesia, or the combination of either with peripheral nerve block (n£¿=£¿8062). Outcome measures were major VTE plus VTE-related mortality, major bleeding and major plus clinically relevant bleeding events.General, neuraxial and combination anaesthesia were used in 29%, 52% and 19% of patients, respectively. Differences in efficacy and safety between anaesthesia subgroups were small and not significant, except for a slightly higher rate of major VTE and VTE-related mortality with general versus neuraxial anaesthesia (odds ratio: 1.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.03¨C1.90; p£¿=£¿0.035) in the overall population. There were no significant effects of anaesthesia type on efficacy or safety of dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin.Anaesthesia type did not greatly affect efficacy and safety outcomes in the pooled population of all three treatment groups. The efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate was comparable with enoxaparin, regardless of type of anaesthesia.ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00168805, NCT00168818, NCT00152971.
%K Thromboprophylaxis
%K Type of anaesthesia
%K Venous thromboembolism
%K Bleeding
%K Dabigatran etexilate
%U http://www.thrombosisjournal.com/content/10/1/9/abstract