%0 Journal Article
%T Written evidence for the case Armstrong v. U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, 1:12-cv-00606, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, Austin
%A Alexei R. Koudinov
%J Doping Journal
%D 2012
%I 
%X On June 12, 2012 United States Anti-doping Agency (USADA) released a letter charging cyclist Lance Armstrong and his teammates of severe blood doping violations based on blood samples that are "fully consistent" with performance enhancement. To protect his seven Tour de France titles, Armstrong filed a lawsuit and requested to block USADA from forcing him into arbitration over claims he used performance-enhancing drugs (case Armstrong v. U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, 1:12-cv-00606, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, Austin). This written evidence addressed to judge Sam Sparks and provides i) analysis of faked WADA test for blood doping and ii) a case study of a corrupted system of sports-doping violations arbitration by Tribunal of Arbitration for Sports. The evidence also serves to explain why and how World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), International Olympic committe (IOC) and Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) are cheating athletes, scientists, governments and public.
%K Doping Journal
%K World Anti-doping Association
%K WADA
%K International Olympic Committee
%K IOC
%K Team USA
%K United States Anti-doping agency
%K USADA
%K International Cycling Union
%K UCI
%K US cycling
%K blood doping
%K Epo
%K Court of Arbitration for Sports
%K CAS
%K Tribunal
%K American Arbitration Association
%K AAA
%K doping
%K sports
%K sport medicine
%U http://dopingjournal.org/9/4/