%0 Journal Article
%T Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review
%A Azavedo Edward
%A Zackrisson Sophia
%A Mejš€re Ingegerd
%A Heibert Arnlind Marianne
%J BMC Medical Imaging
%D 2012
%I BioMed Central
%R 10.1186/1471-2342-12-22
%X Background In accordance with European guidelines, mammography screening comprises independent readings by two breast radiologists (double reading). CAD (computer-aided detection) has been suggested to complement or replace one of the two readers (single reading + CAD). The aim of this systematic review is to address the following question: Is the reading of mammographic x-ray images by a single breast radiologist together with CAD at least as accurate as double reading? Methods The electronic literature search included the databases Pub Med, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers assessed abstracts and full-text articles. Results 1049 abstracts were identified, of which 996 were excluded with reference to inclusion and exclusion criteria; 53 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Finally, four articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and one in a GRADE synthesis. Conclusions The scientific evidence is insufficient to determine whether the accuracy of single reading + CAD is at least equivalent to that obtained in standard practice, i.e. double reading where two breast radiologists independently read the mammographic images.
%K CAD
%K Mammography
%K Screening
%K Breast
%K Cancer
%K Single reading
%K Double reading
%U http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2342/12/22