%0 Journal Article
%T Repr¨¦sentation religieuse chez Kant et la philosophie k¨¦rygmatique de la religion de Ric ur La repr¨¦sentation religieuse chez Kant et la philosophie k¨¦rygmatique de la religion de Ric ur
%A Myung Su Yang
%J ¨¦tudes Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
%D 2012
%I University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
%R 10.5195/errs.2012.141
%X La philosophie Ric urienne de la religion suit l¡¯anthropologie kantienne, la bont¨¦ originaire et le mal radical de la nature humaine. Ric ur, toutefois, consid¨¨re le probl¨¨me du mal plus profond¨¦ment que Kant. Il cherche alors, dans le k¨¦rygme religieux, la motivation plus profonde que le motif autonome, alors que Kant, par l¡¯interpr¨¦tation all¨¦gorique, s¡¯adonne ¨¤ la d¨¦mystication de la religion historique. Le Dieu nomm¨¦ s¡¯addresse, au-del¨¤ du Dieu conceptuel kantien, au sens super-abondant au millieu du non-sens de la vie et ouvre l¡¯horizon de th¨¦onomie. Celle-ci fait du commandement de l¡¯amour un appel non-violent; l¡¯amour qui r¨¦unit la forme universelle et la mati¨¨re particuli¨¨re de la norme morale.           Ric ur¡¯s philosophy of religion follows the anthroplogy of Kant, according to which human nature is originally good and at the same time radically evil. Ric ur, however, considers the problem of evil more profoundly than Kant. He tries to find, in the religious kerygma, a deeper motivation of it than autonomy, whereas Kant, by means of allegorical interpretation, engages in the demystification of religion. The named God refers, beyond the conceptual God of Kant, to a super-abundant meaning in the midst of the meaninglessness of life and thus opens the horizen of theonomy. Theonomy makes the commandment of love into a non-violent appeal. Love combines the universal form and the particular content of the moral norm.
%K Evil
%K Antinomy
%K Pure Religion
%K Historical Religion
%K Theonomy
%U http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/141