%0 Journal Article
%T The Other or How to Dispose of It. A Prolegomena to All Future Alterology that Would Like to Present Itself as Phenomenology Kitas, arba kaip jo atsikratyti. Prolegomenai kiekvienai b¨±simai alterologijai, nor sian iai b¨±ti fenomenologija
%A Claudio Majolino
%A St¨¦phane Desroys du Roure
%J Coactivity : Philosophy, Communication
%D 2009
%I Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
%R 10.3846/1822-430x.2009.17.3.5-16
%X Phenomenology was first an egology (Husserl), then an ontology (Heidegger). Today, it takes more and more the form of what we may call an ¡°alterology,¡± that is, an attempt to think the constitutive phenomenon of a radical alterity. This paper aims to put the resources of ¡°alterology¡± to the test by way of a descriptive analysis of the alterity of other individuals. It first examines the texts of Levinas, stressing his (voluntary) conflation of the other person and absolute alterity. It then presents the thought of J.-L. Marion as an attempt to overcome some problems in Levinas¡¯ thesis concerning the relation to individuals. Yet in both cases, and in spite of their differences, once we gain access to the phenomenon of the alterity of the Other, we thus lose the sense of an other as an individual. An interest in alterity is therefore motivated by the aim of systematically providing a device with which one is able to diminish the constitutive power of subjectivity, as opposed to a phenomenological account of the way in which the other shows herself as something emphatically singular ¨C i.e. her ¡°style of appearing. Article in English I  prad i  fenomenologija buvo egologija (Husserlis), v liau ¨C ontologija (Heideggeris).  iandien  ji vis labiau  gyja tai, k  gal tume vadinti  alterologija¡°, pavidal , kaip pastang  apm styti radikali  kityb  konsituojan ius fenomenus.  iame straipsnyje, pasitelkus deskriptyvi  kit  individ  kityb s analiz , siekiama  vertinti  alterologijos¡° prielaidas ir  altinius.  iam tikslui  gyvendinti nagrin jami Levino tekstai, itin daug d mesio kreipiant   jo s moning  kito asmens ir absoliu ios kityb s sugretinim . Toliau parodoma J.-L. Marion pozicija, vertintina kaip bandymas i spr sti kai kurias problemas, su kuriomis susiduria Levino tez , nusakanti individus. Ta iau abiem atvejais, nepaisant esam  skirtum , kai atveriamas pri jimas prie Kito kityb s fenomeno, prarandamas Kito, kaip individualaus, supratimas. D mesys kitybei i  ties  yra motyvuojamas intereso pateikti sisteming  b¨±d  sunaikinti konstitutyvi  subjektyvumo gali , prie ingai tokiam fenomenologiniam ai kinimui, kuriame Kitas parodo save kaip ka k  empati kai i skirtinio ¨C tai yra jo  pasirodymo stili ¡°. Straipsnis angl  kalba
%K Husserl
%K Levinas
%K Marion
%K other
%K alterity
%K individuality
%U http://www.cpc.vgtu.lt/index.php/cpc/article/view/32