%0 Journal Article
%T Accuracy of an Immunochromatographic Diagnostic Test (ICT Malaria Combo Cassette Test) Compared to Microscopy among under Five-Year-Old Children when Diagnosing Malaria in Equatorial Guinea
%A Jos¨¦-Luis Portero
%A Maria Rubio-Yuste
%A Miguel Angel Descalzo
%A Jose Raso
%A Magdalena Lwanga
%A Jaquelina Obono
%A Gloria Nseng
%A Agustin Benito
%A Jorge Cano
%J Malaria Research and Treatment
%D 2010
%I Hindawi Publishing Corporation
%R 10.4061/2010/858427
%X Conventional malaria diagnosis based on microscopy raises serious difficulties in weak health systems. Cost-effective and sensitive rapid diagnostic tests have been recently proposed as alternatives to microscopy. In Equatorial Guinea, a study was conducted to assess the reliability of a rapid diagnostic test compared to microscopy. The study was designed in accordance with the directives of the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Initiative (STARD). Peripheral thick and thin films for the microscopy diagnosis and a rapid immunochromatographic test (ICT Malaria Combo Cassette Test) were performed on under five-year-old children with malaria suspicion. The ICT test detected Plasmodium spp. infection with a sensitivity of 81.5% and a specificity of 81.9% while P. falciparum diagnosis occurred with a sensitivity of 69.7% and a specificity of 73.7%. The sensitivity of the ICT test increased with higher parasitemias. The general results showed little concordance between the ICT test and microscopy (kappa = 0.28, se: 0.04). In Equatorial Guinea, the ICT Malaria Combo Cassette Test has proven to be an acceptable test to detect high P. falciparum parasitemias. However, the decrease of sensitivity at medium and low parasitemias hampers that ICT can replace properly performed microscopy at present in the diagnosis of malaria in children. 1. Background The current malaria control strategies are mainly based on early diagnosis and a correct treatment of the cases. These are essential to reduce the fatal outcome of the disease [1]. However, the weakness of the health systems in many endemic countries, particularly at the peripheral level, means that the malaria diagnosis has to be based on clinical criteria. Taking into account that other infectious diseases course with signs and symptoms like malaria, a high percentage of overdiagnosis can be expected in a tropical area [2¨C4]. The growing resistance to drugs commonly used for malaria treatment (chloroquine, quinine, and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine), due to their abusive use in the past, and the arrival of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs), which are more expensive than the former, mean that the methods to diagnose malaria are once again back in the spotlight. Microscopy and the use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are currently considered to be the two diagnostic procedures with the greatest impact on controlling malaria [5]. Microscopy can be a highly useful diagnostic tool, as in expert hands it can detect up to 50 parasites per l (0.001% parasitemia) and identify the plasmodia in 98% of the
%U http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mrt/2010/858427/