%0 Journal Article
%T Analysis of Contoured Anatomic Plate Fixation versus Intramedullary Rod Fixation for Acute Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
%A Juliann Kwak-Lee
%A Elke R. Ahlmann
%A Lingjun Wang
%A John M. Itamura
%J Advances in Orthopedic Surgery
%D 2014
%R 10.1155/2014/518310
%X The recent trend has been toward surgical fixation of displaced clavicle fractures. Several fixation techniques have been reported yet it is unclear which is preferable. We retrospectively reviewed one hundred one consecutive patients with acute midshaft clavicle fractures treated operatively at a level-1 trauma center. Thirty-four patients underwent intramedullary pin fixation and 67 had anatomic plate fixation. The outcomes we assessed were operative time, complications, infection, implant failure, fracture union, range of motion, and reoperation rate. There were 92 males and 9 females with an average age of 30 years (range: 14每68 years). All patients were followed to healing with an average followup of 20 months (range: 15每32 months). While fracture union by six months and range of motion at three months were similar, the overall healing time for pin fixation was shorter . The pin group had more infections and implant failures than the plate group. Intramedullary pin fixation may have improved early results, but there was no long term difference in overall rate of union and achievement of full shoulder motion. The higher rate of implant failure with pin fixation may indicate that not all fracture patterns are amenable to fixation using this device. 1. Introduction Clavicle fractures are common injuries accounting for 5每10% of all fractures [1每3]. The majority of fractures (70每80%) are located within the middle third of the shaft [1, 2, 4]. Traditionally, acute midclavicular fractures have been treated nonoperatively with either sling or figure-of-eight bandage, with a reported less than 1% rate of fracture nonunion [5每8]. Until recently, operative indications typically included open fractures, tenting of the skin, neurovascular injuries, and concomitant shoulder girdle injuries [9, 10]. However, more recent studies have reported nonunion rates of 4每29% [11每16] and malunion rates of 14每36% [9, 14, 17每19] with displaced clavicle fractures. One study demonstrated that shoulder biomechanics were significantly altered by malunion of the clavicle [19]. Patients complained of weakness, rapid fatiguability, loss of endurance, numbness, and paraesthesias with overhead activities and deficits in functional cosmesis. Studies that have used patient-based outcome measures have described unsatisfactory outcome rates of 25每30%, with complications including neurologic symptoms and functional deficits [2, 9, 12, 15, 19]. Improved patient outcomes, earlier return to function, decreased nonunion and malunion rates, and better cosmesis have all been reported with
%U http://www.hindawi.com/journals/aos/2014/518310/