%0 Journal Article
%T Towards A New Reading of the Political Thought of the D¨¦vot Faction: The Opposition to Cardinal Richelieu¡¯s Minist¨¦riat
%A Caroline Maillet-Rao
%J Religions
%D 2013
%I MDPI AG
%R 10.3390/rel4040529
%X For a long time, historiography has considered the political thought of the d¨¦vot party, led by Mathieu de Morgues and Michel de Marillac, to be supportive of a traditional monarchy, Catholicism and the extermination of Protestants, while being opposed to the Thirty Years War. This faction¡¯s political thought has been looked upon as being in contrast to that of Cardinal Richelieu, which was comparatively regarded as profoundly absolutist and modern. Such an understanding of the d¨¦vots¡¯ political thought, albeit disputed, continues to prevail. The present article intends to demonstrate that the d¨¦vots were in fact on the side of the absolutists, which explains their opposition to Richelieu. Indeed, they never criticized absolutism, but rather, the illegitimate leadership of the government by an all-powerful premier ministre, namely, Richelieu. According to the d¨¦vots, the minist¨¦riat actually betrayed the very essence of absolute monarchy. Before proposing a new perspective on its political thought, it is important to reflect upon the definition of the d¨¦vot party. This will be followed by an overview of the lives and work of the principal representatives of this faction, Mathieu de Morgues (1582¨C1670) and Michel de Marillac (1560¨C1632). An examination of the historiography on this subject enables this article¡¯s conclusions to be situated in a broader context.
%K d¨¦vots
%K absolutism
%K minist¨¦riat
%K Mathieu de Morgues
%K Michel de Marillac
%K Richelieu
%U http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/4/4/529