%0 Journal Article
%T Reconsidering vasectomy reversal over assisted reproduction in older couples - Fertility and Sterility
%A Akash A. Kapadia
%A Ann Martinez Acevedo
%A Eugene F. Fuchs
%A Jason C. Hedges
%A Kevin A. Ostrowski
%A Marcus Anthony
%J Fertility and Sterility
%D 2018
%R https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.118
%X To provide pregnancy and live birth rates from a contemporary series of vasectomy reversals in men with female partners aged ¡Ý35 years and to correlate the results with IVF. Tertiary academic referral center. Retrospective comparative study of prospectively collected database. Two hundred forty-six men who underwent vasectomy reversal for fertility with female partner aged ¡Ý35 years. Vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Correlation of pregnancy and live birth rate of this cohort by age groups with most recently published pregnancy and live birth rate per IVF cycle. One hundred thirty-six men who underwent vasectomy reversal between 2006 and 2014 met our inclusion criteria. Overall pregnancy and live birth rates were 35% and 30%, respectively. Subgroup analysis by female age groups (35¨C37, 38¨C40, >40 years) demonstrated pregnancy and live birth rates comparable to those per IVF cycle by age groups according to a recently published (2015) national report. Vasectomy reversal should be strongly considered in men with a partner aged ¡Ü40 years. Additionally, vasectomy reversal can be considered in carefully selected patients even with a partner aged >40 years.
%U https://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(18)30194-8/fulltext