%0 Journal Article
%T Comparison of 3 Derivatization Methods for the Analysis of Amphetamine-Related Drugs in Oral Fluid by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
%A Abdulsallam Bakdash
%A Khaled M Mohamed
%J Archive of "Analytical Chemistry Insights".
%D 2017
%R 10.1177/1177390117727533
%X The heptafluorobutyric anhydride (HFBA), pentafluoropropionic anhydride (PFPA), and trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) are compared as derivatizing reagents to use as the optimal method for the analysis of 10 amphetamines and cathinones in oral fluid. The target compounds were amphetamine (AMP), methamphetamine (MA), 4-methylamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-ethylamphetamine (MDEA), cathinone (CAT), methcathinone, mephedrone, and ephedrine. Amphetamine-D5, MA-D5, MDA-D5, MDMA-D5, and MDEA-D5 use as internal standards (IS). The analytes and IS were extracted from 0.5£¿mL of oral fluid by ethyl acetate in the presence of NaOH (0.1£¿N) as the base and then the dried extracts were derivatized with HFBA, PFPA, or TFAA at 70¡ãC for 30£¿minutes. The limits of quantification based on signal-to-noise ratios ¡İ10 were ranged between 2.5 and 10£¿ng/mL. The calibration graphs were linear in the range of 5 or 10 to 1000£¿ng/mL for all analytes. Based on sensitivity, the PFPA is proved to be the best for derivatization of the target compounds prior to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis
%K Amphetamine
%K drugs
%K oral fluids
%K gas chromatography
%K analysis
%U https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5574487/