%0 Journal Article
%T Comparison of High-Strength Aluminum Ultralight Wheelchairs Using ANSI/RESNA Testing Standards
%A Benjamin Gebrosky
%A Jonathan Pearlman
%A Rory Cooper
%J Archive of "Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation".
%D 2018
%R 10.1310/sci16-00057
%X Background: The use of ultralight manual wheelchairs has been shown to benefit wheelchair users when compared to other types. New aluminum alloy frame materials coming to the market have not been independently evaluated for durability and cost benefit. Methods: Three 70XX aluminum ultralight wheelchair models were tested and compared based on dimensions, stability, and durability using the ANSI/RESNA standards. The results were also compared to previous manual wheelchair studies. Results: This study found that there were no significant cost benefit or durability differences between the wheelchairs tested and previous aluminum or titanium ultralight rigid models. Additionally, 5 of the 9 wheelchairs tested failed to meet the minimum ANSI/RESNA requirements for durability. Conclusion: These results are similar to results from previous rigid ultralight wheelchair studies and indicate that the quality of wheelchairs of this type has not improved and better requirements are necessary for wheelchairs marketed in the United States
%K aluminum wheelchair
%K ANSI/RESNA
%K cost benefit
%K durability
%K manual wheelchair
%K ultralight wheelchair
%K wheelchair
%U https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5791926/