%0 Journal Article
%T A Quality Control Study of the Adherence to Recommended Physiological Targets for the Management of Brain
%A Alison M. Hodak
%A Brett G. Sampson
%A Marianne J. Chapman
%A Mark E. Finnis
%A Philippa N. Jones
%A Stephanie L. O¡¯Connor
%A Steven R. Wilson
%J Progress in Transplantation
%@ 2164-6708
%D 2018
%R 10.1177/1526924818800053
%X The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society and the Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association provide recommendations on the physiological management of brain-dead donors. How often physiological targets are prescribed for brain-dead donors in Australian intensive care units (ICUs), and how well these compare to recommended targets is unknown. It is also unknown how often recommended targets are achieved, irrespective of prescribed targets. We performed a retrospective, observational quality control study in 81 adult (>18 years) brain-dead donors to describe how often physiological targets were prescribed, comparing these to current guidelines. We determined the proportion of observations within the recommended target range, irrespective of any prescribed target. We aimed to identify poor adherence to recommended targets to guide future quality improvement initiatives. Seventy-four (91%) donors had at least 1 prescribed physiological target written on the ICU chart, with a median of 2 (range 2-5), and a maximum of 13 targets. Prescribed targets appeared to adhere well with recommended targets. Most recommended physiological targets were met irrespective of any prescribed target. However, one-quarter of serum sodium observations and one-third of blood glucose levels were above the recommended target. Quality improvement initiatives are required to improve the prescription of physiological targets in brain-dead donors in South Australia. Serum sodium and serum glucose targets were not met. However, this most likely reflects the need for current guidelines to be updated in line with current evidence
%K brain death
%K donor management
%K transplant donor
%K deceased
%K body
%K regions
%K liver transplant recipient
%K kidney transplant
%K recipient
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1526924818800053