%0 Journal Article
%T Extending Rights to Marginalized Minorities: Same
%A Caroline Beer
%A Victor D. Cruz-Aceves
%J State Politics & Policy Quarterly
%@ 1946-1607
%D 2018
%R 10.1177/1532440017751421
%X What explains the extension of greater rights to traditionally marginalized minorities? This article compares the extension of legal equality to lebian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in Mexico and the United States with a focus on the legal recognition of same-sex relationships. A national-level comparison of gay rights in Mexico and the United States presents a theoretical puzzle: most theories predict that the United States would have more egalitarian policies than Mexico, but in fact, Mexico has provided greater legal equality for LGBT people for a longer time than the United States. A subnational analysis of equal relationship rights in the United States and Mexico provides evidence to support social movement and partisan theories of minority rights. We find that religion plays a different role in Mexico than in the United States. The different findings at the national and subnational levels suggest the importance of subnational comparative analysis in heterogeneous federal systems
%K politics of sexuality
%K identity/group politics
%K social movements
%K gender policy
%K public policy
%K same-sex marriage
%K comparative federalism
%K federalism
%U https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1532440017751421